<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mobility Anchor Compatability in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315054#M37003</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is great..  Time to do some official testing but this looks promising.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:24:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paul.ward</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-27T21:24:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mobility Anchor Compatability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315052#M37001</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have the need to install 1140 APs..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a large 4.2 environment with guest wireless.  I am stuck on 4.2 with a couple sites with a lot of 1010 AP's.. Can I run 6 on a WLC and still mobility peer to a 4.2.207 WLC and anchor the guest WLAN?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:12:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315052#M37001</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul.ward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:12:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Anchor Compatability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315053#M37002</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you can. There is a compatability matrix here for EoIP tunnels&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_qanda_item09186a00809ba482.shtml#qa6" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_qanda_item09186a00809ba482.shtml#qa6&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315053#M37002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Nugent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T21:02:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Anchor Compatability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315054#M37003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is great..  Time to do some official testing but this looks promising.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:24:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-anchor-compatability/m-p/1315054#M37003</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul.ward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T21:24:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

