<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mobility Group Issue in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274683#M37005</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a WiSM configured with the same mobility group name and all pre-reqs are ok but the roaming does not works and the client lost connection when change of access-point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw that RF-group are diferents and bootloader version is diferent too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does any one Know if bootloader and RF-group diferent can be the reason for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>danielnunes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:02:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mobility Group Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274683#M37005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a WiSM configured with the same mobility group name and all pre-reqs are ok but the roaming does not works and the client lost connection when change of access-point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw that RF-group are diferents and bootloader version is diferent too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does any one Know if bootloader and RF-group diferent can be the reason for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274683#M37005</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielnunes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:02:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274684#M37006</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;An incorrect or incomplete mobility group configuration should be the most common reason for your problem. In order to overcome this, you need to ensure that your WiSM mobility group is configured correctly as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mobility group name configured must be the same on all the controllers that belong to a particular mobility group. This mobility group name is case sensitive. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mobility group members list configured on each controller needs to contain all the controllers of that particular mobility group. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These configurations ensure that the failover occurs seamlessly and also that when the primary controller comes back on, the previously registered APs fall back to it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274684#M37006</guid>
      <dc:creator>tstanik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-21T20:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274685#M37007</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My mobility group does not working because the Time Server Ã­s diferent in every controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first controller was 7 hours shifted on the second controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After I fix it, roaming on mobility group start working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:51:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274685#M37007</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielnunes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-21T21:51:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274686#M37008</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is interesting... Thanks for sharing ... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:56:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274686#M37008</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-21T23:56:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobility Group Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274687#M37009</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering, i think that Controller is right, because how can it make a roaming of the a LAP at 02:00 to other LAP in other controller at 09:00 for example. I think it's make a sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mobility-group-issue/m-p/1274687#M37009</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielnunes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-22T00:17:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

