<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: bandwidth requirement between controllers in mobility group in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866529#M37156</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's better to have one controller at each site. Minimum bandwidth requirement would be 128 kbps and not more than 100 ms delay in  this WAN link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>irisrios</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-12T18:31:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>bandwidth requirement between controllers in mobility group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866528#M37155</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a potential project spanning two sites a few miles apart. We are hoping of putting 1 controller at each site in a single mobility group to provide AP failover if one controller is to fail. We are planning on a total of 25-30 APs, roughly half at each site. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whats the minimum bandwidth required between sites?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If bandwidth isn't adequate can this be done with both controllers at one site and H-Reap access points for the other site? Am I correct in thinking that you can have no more than 8 H-Reap access points per WLAN (16 Reap APs per WLAN)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 21:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866528#M37155</guid>
      <dc:creator>yubago</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T21:53:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bandwidth requirement between controllers in mobility group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866529#M37156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's better to have one controller at each site. Minimum bandwidth requirement would be 128 kbps and not more than 100 ms delay in  this WAN link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866529#M37156</guid>
      <dc:creator>irisrios</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-12T18:31:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bandwidth requirement between controllers in mobility group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866530#M37157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks! I think it will be fine. I was more worried about the event of a failed controller which would cause more traffic between the other APs and the backup controller at the other site. However with all the APs in H-Reap local switching mode it should work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bandwidth-requirement-between-controllers-in-mobility-group/m-p/866530#M37157</guid>
      <dc:creator>yubago</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-12T23:07:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

