<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless Mobile Phones in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5355#M37371</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a PBX in the true sense of "PBX"? The reason I ask is that one of the main requirements is to move away from a PBX environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have product details (or www link) for the PBX and phones?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mamoss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-04-26T15:23:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Mobile Phones</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5352#M37368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently, we installed a proof-of-concept wireless network for a hospital campus. Part of the requirement was to use mobile wireless phones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For this particular project, we tested spectralink phones. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From this we found out that these phones use a MAC level mulicast to communicate with the gateway. This means that they can't be used across a routed campus. Hence, we created a site wide VLAN to take care of that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had 2 main questions from the test:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) The phones don't set the 802.1p field. Spectralink see this as a facility that Cisco should develop in the AP, not the end phone. Do you know if this is under development?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) These particular phones could not be used as a H323 device in CallManager and we had to use a proprietary gateway from Spectralink. Do you know of H323 capable phones or if this is also under development?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5352#M37368</guid>
      <dc:creator>mamoss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T18:58:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Mobile Phones</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5353#M37369</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've seen Symbol's wireless phone in a Call Manager 2.6 environment, and its H.323: have a look at &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.symbol.com/products/wireless/wireless_sp24_netvisionappli_n.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.symbol.com/products/wireless/wireless_sp24_netvisionappli_n.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We tested Cisco phones (30VIP) calling the Symbol and vice versa, with ver few problems. The only time we had any issue at all was a CM-related bug which has now been fixed and wasnt related to the phones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that's useful, unfortunately I don't have any more details of the exact config.s but it was in a Cisco customer demo site, so shouldnt be too hard to track down!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, keep an eye/ear out for JetCell: that was linked to inbuilding GSM but if I remember a presentation right there were some slides about linking a JetCell and an AVVID environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5353#M37369</guid>
      <dc:creator>abillington</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-04-18T15:57:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Mobile Phones</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5354#M37370</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an alternative,there is new kind of PBX from&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NEC which can be added as H323 gateway in the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;callmanager and there can be mobile wireless&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;phones talking to NEC PBX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5354#M37370</guid>
      <dc:creator>sajithnair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-04-20T20:43:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Mobile Phones</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5355#M37371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a PBX in the true sense of "PBX"? The reason I ask is that one of the main requirements is to move away from a PBX environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have product details (or www link) for the PBX and phones?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-mobile-phones/m-p/5355#M37371</guid>
      <dc:creator>mamoss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-04-26T15:23:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

