<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WLC Tx Power Level Assignment in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028953#M38570</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a WLC running&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;8.2.121.0 that has Wireless 802.11b &amp;gt; RRM &amp;gt; Tx Power Control(TPC)) &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Minimum Power Level Assignment set to&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;dBm. On a 2802 AP, that should be about power level 5. The WLC Power Level Assignment Method is automatic. The APs are set to use the global power and channel configuration. However, the APs lower their power to 6 or 7, which is below the minumum. Any ideas?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bill-anderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:44:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLC Tx Power Level Assignment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028953#M38570</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a WLC running&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;8.2.121.0 that has Wireless 802.11b &amp;gt; RRM &amp;gt; Tx Power Control(TPC)) &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Minimum Power Level Assignment set to&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;dBm. On a 2802 AP, that should be about power level 5. The WLC Power Level Assignment Method is automatic. The APs are set to use the global power and channel configuration. However, the APs lower their power to 6 or 7, which is below the minumum. Any ideas?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028953#M38570</guid>
      <dc:creator>bill-anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:44:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I wouldn't recommend using</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028954#M38571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't recommend using firmware version 8.2.121.0 with 2800/3800 APs. &amp;nbsp;Try 8.2.151.0 as it's more stable and mature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028954#M38571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-27T19:59:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'll try that when we get</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028955#M38572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll try that when we get these APs on their own controller. Thanks for the fast response.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:19:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-tx-power-level-assignment/m-p/3028955#M38572</guid>
      <dc:creator>bill-anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-27T20:19:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

