<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I think you're spot on, in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031736#M38635</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you're spot on, particularly considering you're not integrating CMX with Prime so reducing the complexity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe the WLCs support multiple instances as you could have one doing&amp;nbsp;presence and another doing location.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ric&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ric Beeching</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-10T00:46:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSE and CMX in the same WLC solution ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031735#M38634</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been trying to find some documentation on this, but I am unable to (maybe there is a reason &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; )&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The setup is as follows.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The customer has a Cisco Wireless Solution with WLCs, Prime and a CMX - all working fine and doing what it should do.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the customer now wants to also use Aeroscout tags.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now Aeroscout tags and CMX (MSE10+) is not compatible ( Im hearing that it will be around Q3 this year ), only Aeroscout and MSE 8&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately we need to start using the Aeroscout tags right away.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there any reason why we should not be able to install a new MSE and use that in this solution for tags at the same time we still use the CMX ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The CMX and Prime does not "talk together" (as far as I remember) , the MSE and Prime will - so no problem here would be my guess.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But both CMX and the new MSE would be "talking" to the WLC setup, I dont see why this should not be possible, but Im just afraid that I missed something ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any input would be greatly appreciated &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;/Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031735#M38634</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:40:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I think you're spot on,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031736#M38635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you're spot on, particularly considering you're not integrating CMX with Prime so reducing the complexity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe the WLCs support multiple instances as you could have one doing&amp;nbsp;presence and another doing location.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ric&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031736#M38635</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ric Beeching</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-10T00:46:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>That was also my guess. :-) -</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031738#M38637</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That was also my guess. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; - (or most logical conclusion).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ill set some of it up the day after tomorrow, and ill let you all know how it goes (if anyone is interested &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; )&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;/Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031738#M38637</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-20T13:19:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Definitely keep us posted,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031739#M38638</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Definitely keep us posted, always good to hear the solution once tested!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031739#M38638</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ric Beeching</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-20T13:24:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Everything seems to work fine</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031740#M38639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Everything seems to work fine. So thats a plus bonus... now you know. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I dont think anyone will get into this kind of problem .. but it was an interesting case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 19:01:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mse-and-cmx-in-the-same-wlc-solution/m-p/3031740#M38639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Obbekaer Thomsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-01T19:01:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

