<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Will do, thanks in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067525#M38670</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Will do, thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stephendrkw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-03T16:11:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Anchor WLC High Availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067519#M38664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a new Data Centre with a new ISP design. I have 4 x 5500 WLC's:-&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2 x Anchor Controllers sit on the DMZ one in each Data Centre&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2 x Foreign Controllers (one as Primary Master Controller these manage the internal AP's)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Between each Data Centre DMZ there is a Firewall cluster pair, Primary FW and Standby FW.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Both WLC's share the same external interface subnets as is each Firewall member. The DC's are stretched with DWDM on their independent L2/L3 DMZ Switch Domain&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have joined the Mobility Groups with each Anchor WLC and each Foreign WLC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to make our Anchor WLC's mirror the Firewall Cluster and keep all Guest &amp;amp; BYOD traffic through the Primary Firewall and make one WLC Primary Anchor and keep the other Anchor Controller as Standby.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way I could make one of the Anchor controllers as a Primary and Standby?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(bear in mind these Anchor controllers do not manage any AP's. Anchor's purely act as a DMZ DHCP Server for Guests &amp;amp; BYOD clients and offload to the internet)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've looked at this document &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note there is 60km distance between Data Centres and each Anchor WLC approx 0.5ms&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:37:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067519#M38664</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephendrkw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:37:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using auto-anchor you can</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067520#M38665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Using auto-anchor you can specify two anchors but clients will just get round-robined between them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would your scenario permit both anchors to pass traffic and then, in the event of an outage to one the other will service all clients until the other recovers?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The other option is the one you've listed with HA SSO as the document you've referenced specifies that quite nicely!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For SSO though you'll need to span a Layer 2 VLAN across your DCs for the redundancy port to work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Client SSO will work with Anchor-Foreign mobility setup as well as Guest Anchor scenarios.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067520#M38665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ric Beeching</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-28T13:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presently I have auto-anchor</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067521#M38666</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Presently I have auto-anchor setup and yes clients get round robin balanced between Anchor WLC's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't mind this setup in the new Infrastructure, however our Primary Firewall and Primary ISP Router are in one Data Centre, Standby in the other DC. I suppose if I chose auto-anchor&amp;nbsp;to roll out to Production&amp;nbsp;the delay would be minimal, a few milliseconds whilst it routes across my DWDM link. It would be nice to have a Primary Anchor WLC in one site. I really don't think it's possible in my setup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SSO is a great feature and I do span L2 across DC's&amp;nbsp;but this scenario would only be helpful&amp;nbsp;if all your WLC's manage AP's, in my case the Anchor WLC's manage zero AP's and Anchors manage Guest &amp;amp; BYOD SSID only, my&amp;nbsp;Foreign WLC's manage all&amp;nbsp;8 SSID's.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067521#M38666</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephendrkw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-01T15:53:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I don't think it would matter</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067522#M38667</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think it would matter as you have very good latency between the DCs unless of course that link becomes congested.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The advantage of SSO in this scenario isn't for AP SSO but for client SSO on the anchors which is supported.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 02:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067522#M38667</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ric Beeching</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T02:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm going to upgrade to Cisco</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067523#M38668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm going to upgrade to Cisco's AssureWare latest version 8.0.140.0&amp;nbsp;and Field Image 1.9.0.0 firstly as documents says SSO client is supported from 7.5.x I'm running AssureWare 7.4.121.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And yes&amp;nbsp;it shouldn't cause any sort&amp;nbsp;of significant delay RRing client traffic&amp;nbsp;between WLC's. Once I upgrade and setup Redundant &amp;amp; Eth1 ports on both controllers I'll configure client SSO across DC's lets see if this works!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067523#M38668</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephendrkw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T14:06:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sounds good, let us know how</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067524#M38669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sounds good, let us know how you get on!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ric&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067524#M38669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ric Beeching</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T14:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will do, thanks</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067525#M38670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Will do, thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/anchor-wlc-high-availability/m-p/3067525#M38670</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephendrkw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T16:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

