topic Does the browser recognize it in Wireless

WLC: which software-version support SHA2 certificates for Web Authentification and Web Management ?

Carsten Ruckelshausen — Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:07:13 GMT

Hello,

I tried to install new SHA2 3th-Party certificates on our WLCs. There are old WiSM1-Boards and 2504 to support our old 1230 Access Points, running 7.0.251.2, which didn't install it, although the config manual for 7.6 and 8.0 say that SHA2 certificates are supported since 7.0.250.0. When I tried to install the SHA2-certificates I get the message "File transfer failed" an the log says:

*TransferTask: Dec 12 13:22:14.394: #UPDATE-3-CERT_INST_FAIL: updcode.c:1869 Failed to install Webauth certificate. rc = 1
*TransferTask: Dec 12 13:22:14.394: #SSHPM-3-KEYED_PEM_DECODE_FAILED: sshpmcert.c:4085 Cannot PEM decode private key

I tried to install the same certificates on our WiSM2-Boards, running 7.4.121.0 and I failed too. The same certificates could be installed on a 2504 running 8.0.100 without any problems.

In all 3 cases I tried to install unchained certificates for web management and Level 3 chained certificates for web authentication. I used the following guides to get the certificates (e.g. taken from the config manual 8.0.100):

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/4400-series-wireless-lan-controllers/109597-csr-chained-certificates-wlc-00.html

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wlan-security/70584-csr-wlc-00.pdf

Which software versions support SHA2 certificates and which didn't ? Is the a list for it ?

Regards

Could be the bug : Need WLC

Saurav Lodh — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:02:18 GMT

Could be the bug : Need WLC Support for SHA-256 #CSCup57577

Known affected release : 7.4(121.0)

The WLC supports SHA-2

Freerk Terpstra — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:33:47 GMT

The WLC supports SHA-2 certificates since release 8.0.100, so at this moment this is the only release where this is supported on.

Hello, I solved the problem.

Carsten Ruckelshausen — Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:00:55 GMT

Hello,

I solved the problem. First I used a Debian Linux system with Openssl 1.0.1. After I searched the internet using one of the log messages above I found sites which mentioned to use Openssl 0.9.x. So I tried a productive and security fixes Debian Linux System running Openssl 0.9.8 and I succeeded. The wlcs accepted the certificate files and used it after a reboot. The Web GUI still shows a SHA1 Fingerprint, but the certificate signature Algorithm is SHA2:

Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption

When you check the openssl.org homepage Openssl 0.9.8 is still one of the actual version of openssl and is still available and fixed. But the Openssl Roadmap says:

"We don't want to have to maintain too many branches. This is likely to include a timescale for the EOL of version 0.9.8"

I don't know the differences between certificates made with openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1. Is there anybody who can explain it to me ?

Regards

Does the browser recognize it

sestonenppd — Mon, 16 May 2016 20:01:27 GMT

Does the browser recognize it as a SHA-1 or SHA-2? Or, in other words, will this allow us to create certificates that will continue to function after IE and Chrome start rejection HTTPS web pages using SHA-1?