<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WLC 2106 question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557467#M46925</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what is the best solution if i connect 1142 Aps and enable 802.11n?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christos Stefaneskou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-05T18:33:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557460#M46918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the recomended way to connect&amp;nbsp; 5 APs 1242 to a wlc 2106?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Connect directly the 5 APs to the wlc and use one port for the management interface and connection to the switch or to connect the APs to a switch and use one connection for the wlc?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 02:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557460#M46918</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christos Stefaneskou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T02:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557461#M46919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use a switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:38:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557461#M46919</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-01T21:38:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557462#M46920</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;use a switch as Leo said. that is a much better approach. you can also read this for extra info: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-13960"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-13960&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Serge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557462#M46920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Serge Yasmine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T12:53:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557463#M46921</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only one port (10/100mbps) for connection between WLC and switch will be a bottleneck??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's the solution for this according that 2106 doesn't support LAG?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557463#M46921</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christos Stefaneskou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T13:41:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557464#M46922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i guess the WLC that we are looking into supports only 6 APs i guess.. so i dont think there will be a bottle neck..also bottle neck depends on the configuration as well.. i have not seen any bottle neck issue till now..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Surendra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557464#M46922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Surendra BG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T13:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557465#M46923</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you said, one port between wlc and switch and no lag support. It is still fair for the 2106 scalability. LAG is supported on higher range WLCs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557465#M46923</guid>
      <dc:creator>Serge Yasmine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T13:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557466#M46924</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depends on the AP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One FastEthernet connection to the switch doens't "really" create a bottleneck.&amp;nbsp; Your AP might.&amp;nbsp; If you, say, you have 1130 or older then I'd say no significant bottleneck because the APs are also FastEthernet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use the newer ones, like the 1250 and newer, which has GigEthernet and/or higher throughput (if you enable 802.11n) the yes.&amp;nbsp; The switch AND the WLC 2100 are both the bottleneck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557466#M46924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T22:01:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557467#M46925</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what is the best solution if i connect 1142 Aps and enable 802.11n?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557467#M46925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christos Stefaneskou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-05T18:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 2106 question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557468#M46926</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what is the best solution if i connect 1142 Aps and enable 802.11n?&lt;/P&gt;I'd look for a 4400 (at least).&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-2106-question/m-p/1557468#M46926</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-05T21:48:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

