<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WLC Rogue Detection in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623811#M49916</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.  I know what RSSi and SNR is.  The question is why do they both sometimes get reported with a value of -1.  Typically, RSSI and SNR is the inverse of the other. When one goes up the other goes down.  Anybody have any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>george.goebel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-26T16:31:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLC Rogue Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623809#M49914</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just wondering if anybody knows why when looking at the Rogue detection, the RSSI and SNR are both -1.  What is the significance of -1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:39:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623809#M49914</guid>
      <dc:creator>george.goebel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:39:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC Rogue Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623810#M49915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;RSSI level indicate the signal strength. If your RSSI level is low it could be because of any interference&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps2360/products_qanda_item09186a00801d29ff.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps2360/products_qanda_item09186a00801d29ff.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:35:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623810#M49915</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.hsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-26T15:35:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC Rogue Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623811#M49916</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.  I know what RSSi and SNR is.  The question is why do they both sometimes get reported with a value of -1.  Typically, RSSI and SNR is the inverse of the other. When one goes up the other goes down.  Anybody have any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-rogue-detection/m-p/623811#M49916</guid>
      <dc:creator>george.goebel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-26T16:31:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

