<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;too close&amp;quot;?  in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097550#M50730</link>
    <description>&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;How "close" is "too close"?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;15 to 20 m apart&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;What is the channel and power of each radio?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Default Dynamic Settings&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Attenuation? &amp;nbsp;Where are they?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Warehouse with medium density&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dot1x</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-01T12:56:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High density warehouse - Access Point Positioning</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097548#M50728</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For a high density warehouse location, if we put APs too close to eachother, would we have co-channel interference?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any best practices to reduce the co-channel interference in such dense areas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it a good idea to use TPCv2?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/7-2/configuration/guide/cg/cg_rrm.html" target="_blank"&gt;Document &lt;/A&gt;says: TPCv2 is suitable for dense networks. In this mode, there could be higher roaming delays and coverage hole incidents.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If reducing power doesn't really work, is it a good idea to reduce the cell size by allowing only higher data rates?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 14:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097548#M50728</guid>
      <dc:creator>dot1x</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T14:27:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For a high density warehouse</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097549#M50729</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For a high density warehouse location, if we put APs too close to eachother, would we have co-channel interference?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's not an easy question to answer. &amp;nbsp;There are a lot of factors which may or may not affect co-channel interference. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;How "close" is "too close"?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;What is the channel and power of each radio?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Attenuation? &amp;nbsp;Where are they?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097549#M50729</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-01T11:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How "close" is "too close"? </title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097550#M50730</link>
      <description>&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;How "close" is "too close"?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;15 to 20 m apart&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;What is the channel and power of each radio?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Default Dynamic Settings&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Attenuation? &amp;nbsp;Where are they?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Warehouse with medium density&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097550#M50730</guid>
      <dc:creator>dot1x</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-01T12:56:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DCA assigns Power Level 7 to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097551#M50731</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;DCA assigns Power Level 7 to most of the APs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can also see 60 to 70 % interference.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 07:15:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097551#M50731</guid>
      <dc:creator>dot1x</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-02T07:15:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In this case, indeed to close</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097552#M50732</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In this case, indeed to close. With &amp;gt; 30% of interference, problems can start. Also with Level 7, the power is already on the lowest.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suggest to do a site survey an completely change the placements of the APs or use external antennas, specific for your installation and site survey.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 09:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/high-density-warehouse-access-point-positioning/m-p/3097552#M50732</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-02T09:26:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

