<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic No Impact unless they are in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919419#M51101</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;No Impact unless they are using same&amp;nbsp;channel.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Like&amp;nbsp;for 802.11&amp;nbsp;b/g/n 1 ,6 ,11 these are non overlapping channels.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 06:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sachintambat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-14T06:24:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>keeping two access point in the same room ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919418#M51100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i have a employee who is requesting to have two access points in his office which are connected to the same WLC , wouldn't that actually have negative impact on wireless performance for him in the room or not?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919418#M51100</guid>
      <dc:creator>baselzind</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T11:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Impact unless they are</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919419#M51101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No Impact unless they are using same&amp;nbsp;channel.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Like&amp;nbsp;for 802.11&amp;nbsp;b/g/n 1 ,6 ,11 these are non overlapping channels.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 06:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919419#M51101</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachintambat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-14T06:24:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>but would it provide any</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919420#M51102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;but would it provide any improvement in signal coverage?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 06:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919420#M51102</guid>
      <dc:creator>baselzind</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-14T06:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes
It will</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919421#M51103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It will&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919421#M51103</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachintambat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-14T07:10:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No issues you can use access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919422#M51104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No issues you can use access points with different channels, if they are in same channel then co-channel interference is issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 02:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/keeping-two-access-point-in-the-same-room/m-p/2919422#M51104</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohanak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-16T02:21:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

