<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Linksys access point is better than cisco's wireless router !? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/linksys-access-point-is-better-than-cisco-s-wireless-router/m-p/909957#M54002</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I bought a Linksys WAP54G yesterday to &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see whether my 871w is faulty. (Constant signal drops).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I was testing, I noticed that WAP54G has a better signal strength than the 871w.  What's interesting is, Linksys WAP54G only has a max power output of 15.5dbm, while the Cisco 871w has the max output of 17 dbm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used the netstumbler to measure the signal strength.  Linksys WAP54G can constantly stay at -60dbm, while the Cisco 871w (with the max power configured) goes up and down (between -70 and -60 dbm).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are both configured to use the same channel.  I find this strange as to why a higher power output has a much lower efficiency compare to a lower power output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 22:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>computerguy9355</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T22:11:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linksys access point is better than cisco's wireless router !?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/linksys-access-point-is-better-than-cisco-s-wireless-router/m-p/909957#M54002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I bought a Linksys WAP54G yesterday to &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see whether my 871w is faulty. (Constant signal drops).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I was testing, I noticed that WAP54G has a better signal strength than the 871w.  What's interesting is, Linksys WAP54G only has a max power output of 15.5dbm, while the Cisco 871w has the max output of 17 dbm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used the netstumbler to measure the signal strength.  Linksys WAP54G can constantly stay at -60dbm, while the Cisco 871w (with the max power configured) goes up and down (between -70 and -60 dbm).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are both configured to use the same channel.  I find this strange as to why a higher power output has a much lower efficiency compare to a lower power output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 22:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/linksys-access-point-is-better-than-cisco-s-wireless-router/m-p/909957#M54002</guid>
      <dc:creator>computerguy9355</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T22:11:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linksys access point is better than cisco's wireless router</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/linksys-access-point-is-better-than-cisco-s-wireless-router/m-p/909958#M54003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you see this happening with all the 870 ISRs? I am suspecting a hardware issue. Can you check with a different ISR and see if you are observing the same behaviour ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/linksys-access-point-is-better-than-cisco-s-wireless-router/m-p/909958#M54003</guid>
      <dc:creator>drolemc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-16T14:46:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

