<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AP load balancing question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193352#M59158</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cool thanks, RF profiles associated to AP groups sounds interesting. Load balancing is OK for static environments, it becomes a pain for roaming clients though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LF007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T12:48:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AP load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193350#M59156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there, is it possible to enable load balancing for a particular group of APs and disabled for the rest. Perhaps AP groups. Running 8500 WLC with 3600 series APs. It will enhance the service concurrent user capacities for areas with a high device count.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193350#M59156</guid>
      <dc:creator>LF007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193351#M59157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nope and I wouldn't recommend that feature. It cause soooooo many client issues when you around 12 clients associating to a given AP. If you have high density then as long as you are running v7.2, you have RF Profiles. These profiles are defined per AP Group if you want. On the RF Policies I would tweak the data rates depending on how the coverage is when looking at a post site survey. Knowing the power and the coverage pattern allows one to disable rates, set various rates as support and or mandatory. This is how you can reduce the cell size and have better client balancing that to enable client load balancing. Also tweaking the RRM is required too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193351#M59157</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-12T12:05:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193352#M59158</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cool thanks, RF profiles associated to AP groups sounds interesting. Load balancing is OK for static environments, it becomes a pain for roaming clients though.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193352#M59158</guid>
      <dc:creator>LF007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-12T12:48:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193353#M59159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Load balancing isn't good at all...... I would not use that at all, heck I wish they removed that feature to be honest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Scott &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193353#M59159</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-12T13:03:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AP load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193354#M59160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great advice as usual buddy! +5 for your ongoing support here &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Talk about a dream &lt;BR /&gt;Try to make it real"&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;- Springsteen &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-load-balancing-question/m-p/2193354#M59160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-12T14:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

