<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic rogue APs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975621#M60034</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I guess I mean Tag the rogue as MaIicious or friendly,?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Ley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-03T12:38:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>rogue APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975617#M60030</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have several locations where I have 2-3 APs and they are both picking up 20-25 rogue APs. As I understand it they are just listening to these guys and informing me of there presence. I have labled a few of these rogue APs, but more pop up every week. My question is this: does labeling these rogue APs do anything for the performance of my APs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975617#M60030</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Ley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T05:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rogue APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975618#M60031</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rogue detection happens passively if the rogue detection enabled on the advanced tab of AP. there is a limit for each WLC platform like how many they can detect and keep it in their database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Client disruptions happens if the AP does RLDP, Rogue containment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975618#M60031</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saravanan Lakshmanan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-02T20:19:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rogue APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975619#M60032</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; IF RLDP is enabled the AP will try to connect to the rouge as client which causes service disruption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure that it is disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975619#M60032</guid>
      <dc:creator>maldehne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T06:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rogue APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975620#M60033</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you exactly mean by "labeling" the rogue APs? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975620#M60033</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amjad Abdullah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T08:25:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rogue APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975621#M60034</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I guess I mean Tag the rogue as MaIicious or friendly,?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-aps/m-p/1975621#M60034</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Ley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T12:38:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

