<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Rogue AP: Question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379396#M62061</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you contain a rougue access point. That happens this access point?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>colmgrier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-30T20:31:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379392#M62057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need a bit of info with the below topics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q1. What is a Rogue AP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q2. WLC 4400 is detecting a number of rogue access points from neighboring buildings. How should the WLC 4400 deal with these rogue access points?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q3. Can the WLC 4400 block these accees points from broadcasting their SSID's into our air space?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Colm&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379392#M62057</guid>
      <dc:creator>colmgrier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:23:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379393#M62058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q1. What is a Rogue AP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A Rogue is an AP that we can hear, that is not part of the RF Group.&amp;nbsp; Rogue on the Wire is an AP that is not part of our RF Group, and is found in ARP on the LAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q2. WLC 4400 is detecting a number of rogue access points from neighboring buildings. How should the WLC 4400 deal with these rogue access points?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WLC should alert you that there are other AP's out there that can be heard, by default.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q3. Can the WLC 4400 block these accees points from broadcasting their SSID's into our air space?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Yes, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;BUT&lt;/SPAN&gt;!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; There can be legal reprocutions from "containing" these rogues. Best bet, is to find out who owns them and work with them to get the power lowered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379393#M62058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T19:05:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379394#M62059</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve for great feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do the WLC 4400 block or contain these rougue access points. Can you explain the below options.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Class Type:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unclassified&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;friendly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;malicious&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Update Status:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contain&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q3. Can the WLC 4400 block these accees points from broadcasting their SSID's into our air space?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Yes, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;BUT&lt;/SPAN&gt;!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; There can be legal reprocutions from "containing" these rogues. Best bet, is to find out who owns them and work with them to get the power lowered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Colm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:18:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379394#M62059</guid>
      <dc:creator>colmgrier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T20:18:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379395#M62060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; the Clases, you have the ability to define what criteria must be met for a roge to be called friendly or malicious.&amp;nbsp; Under the Security tab &amp;gt; Wireless Protection Policy, Rogue Policies, Rogue Rules.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Class Type:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unclassified&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;---&amp;nbsp; AP detected but not matching any policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;friendly&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;---&amp;nbsp; AP matches the criteria of a friendly AP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;malicious &amp;lt;--- AP matches the criteria of a malicious AP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Update Status:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contain &amp;lt;--Contain the AP, uses our own AP to spoof the AP to get the clients to join "us" instead of "them" , once again, you need to be real careful with this, as if you are containing your neighbors, there can be reprocussions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alert&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;-- Just a message saying there is a rogue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379395#M62060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T20:25:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379396#M62061</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you contain a rougue access point. That happens this access point?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379396#M62061</guid>
      <dc:creator>colmgrier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T20:31:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379397#M62062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379397#M62062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T20:38:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379398#M62063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you contain an AP, does this disable the AP for all clients in the shared airspace or all airspace?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:55:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379398#M62063</guid>
      <dc:creator>colmgrier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T20:55:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379399#M62064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only clients that are within range of your access point that is containing the rogue will be deauthenicated. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379399#M62064</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T22:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379400#M62065</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd be very careful trying to contain Rogue APs/Clients because you and/or your company can be brought to court.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have, in several occasions, successfully done so because I made sure the Rogue AP and/or clients were physically found INSIDE our company's premises.&amp;nbsp; When the offenders raised a trouble ticket (after buying three APs) we confronted them (with cricket bat!) they initially denied but I gave them the facts:&amp;nbsp; AP's manufacturer, the SSID, no encryption (duh!), the clients associated to the AP, they meekly admitted and pulled down their "cowboy" network lest I report them to the CIO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otherwise, if the signals are coming from OUTSIDE the premises, I have little choice but ignore them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/1379400#M62065</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T22:32:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rogue AP: Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/3316934#M62067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you please let us know how it was resolved? When implementing policy do the Rogues disappear? Will it help performance of legitimate AP's?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rogue-ap-question/m-p/3316934#M62067</guid>
      <dc:creator>lesboyce911</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T16:47:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

