<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 802.11n and Ap density in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274693#M62423</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not done a lot of testing with 802.11n on a controller (just played around at home with a few standalone APs).  All things being equal, your difference in channels widths is (40Mhz on the 5Ghz versus 20MHz on the 2.4GHz) explains the speed difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, be aware that speeds will typically jump around depending on your location (with respect to the AP), how many other clients are associated to the AP, the presence of 802.11a/g clients, the presence of 802.11b clients, interference, and a whole host of other factors.  Don't expect to always get the best speed from your APs - even if you are 3 feet from one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robert.N.Barrett_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-14T15:29:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>802.11n and Ap density</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274690#M62420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi to all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to deploy many 1142 aps with 5500 controller. All aps will be near each other so it will be high ap density. To avoid interference issue i'm thinking&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to activate RRM on controller and 40 mhz channel on 802.11n 5Ghz. With this configuration, among others, i reach 300 Mbps, but i have some questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to this config, do i keep 3 non-overlapping channels on 802.11n 2,4 Ghz?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do i keep the 12 non-overlapping channels on 802.11n 5ghz?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274690#M62420</guid>
      <dc:creator>uosambela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:59:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n and Ap density</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274691#M62421</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll want to use 20 MHz channels in the 2.4GHz band.  That's the only way to get the 3 non-overlapping channels (channels 1, 6, and 11).  When you switch to 40 MHz channels, then you end up with one non-overlapping channel because you have to bond 1 &amp;amp; 6 or 6 &amp;amp; 11 to get the 40 MHz channel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have my 5 GHz channel list handy, but if you normally have 12 non-overlapping channels at 20 MHz widths, then you will have half that when you enable 40MHz channel widths.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274691#M62421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert.N.Barrett_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-27T12:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n and Ap density</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274692#M62422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer, Robert.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured my WLC according to my previous post:RRM, 40 Mhz on 802.11n 5Ghz, 20Mhz on 802.11n 2,4 Ghz, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes i get 300 mbps speed (when i connect to 802.11n 5Ghz), but when i'm connected to 802.11n 2,4 i just get 144.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to keep always 300mbps speed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274692#M62422</guid>
      <dc:creator>uosambela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-07T11:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n and Ap density</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274693#M62423</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not done a lot of testing with 802.11n on a controller (just played around at home with a few standalone APs).  All things being equal, your difference in channels widths is (40Mhz on the 5Ghz versus 20MHz on the 2.4GHz) explains the speed difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, be aware that speeds will typically jump around depending on your location (with respect to the AP), how many other clients are associated to the AP, the presence of 802.11a/g clients, the presence of 802.11b clients, interference, and a whole host of other factors.  Don't expect to always get the best speed from your APs - even if you are 3 feet from one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-and-ap-density/m-p/1274693#M62423</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert.N.Barrett_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-14T15:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

