<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AP Rogues 'On Network' in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203217#M62753</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We see several Rogue APs in our network which are, according to WCS, not 'On Network'. However, most of them do turn out to be 'On Network': their MAC address appears as connected&amp;amp;active in a switch port. I wonder if this is because the 'On Network' status is never re-examined after first detection? Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:36:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>b.smeets</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:36:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AP Rogues 'On Network'</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203217#M62753</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We see several Rogue APs in our network which are, according to WCS, not 'On Network'. However, most of them do turn out to be 'On Network': their MAC address appears as connected&amp;amp;active in a switch port. I wonder if this is because the 'On Network' status is never re-examined after first detection? Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:36:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203217#M62753</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.smeets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:36:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP Rogues 'On Network'</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203218#M62754</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is the MAC active on a switchport but not on your network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203218#M62754</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeff.kish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-15T11:56:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP Rogues 'On Network'</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203219#M62755</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Rogue's MAC is active on a switchport, HENCE the Rogue is 'on the network'. But WCS says it's not on the network. How come?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203219#M62755</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.smeets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-15T13:33:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP Rogues 'On Network'</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203220#M62756</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A couple of questions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What LWAPs are you using&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Have you enabled Rogue Location Discovery protocol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Have you configured dedicated Rogue detector LWAPs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) Have you got legacy Autonomous APs on your network &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203220#M62756</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark.cronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-15T18:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP Rogues 'On Network'</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203221#M62757</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Forgive me but are we talking about plain Rogue AP or Rogue AP on Network Wire?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:15:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203221#M62757</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-17T00:15:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP Rogues 'On Network'</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203222#M62758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) 1130AG's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) No, and that's the answer to my problem: I didn't know (but do know now) that Rogues On Network can only be detected by LWAPs in Rogue Detector Mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) No.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, my problem is solved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-rogues-on-network/m-p/1203222#M62758</guid>
      <dc:creator>b.smeets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-26T13:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

