<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lightweight and IOS AP? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lightweight-and-ios-ap/m-p/714739#M64921</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been working with IOS based autonomous APs for a some time now.  However, need to have following questions clarified regarding Lightweight models.  I have few of these APs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. AIR-AP1242AG-E-K9 (IOS ver. 12.3(8)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b. AIR-LAP1242AG-P-K9 (IOS ver. 12.3(11)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot seem to determine any difference between the two APs functionality as far as configuration options are considered.  I understand that IOS autonomous APs do not connect to WLCs (by default).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. I am able to configure RADIUS on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b. I am able to configure SSIDs on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c. I am able to assign an IP to both the APs for management&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions then: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can Lighwieght AP work independantly of the wireless LAN controllers?  The documentation says they cannot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Is it IOS dependant? i.e. can LAP be made to work like an autonomous AP using an appropriate IOS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. If LAP works just as IOS AP then why does Cisco offers them under different product IDs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>magurwara</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:54:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lightweight and IOS AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lightweight-and-ios-ap/m-p/714739#M64921</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been working with IOS based autonomous APs for a some time now.  However, need to have following questions clarified regarding Lightweight models.  I have few of these APs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. AIR-AP1242AG-E-K9 (IOS ver. 12.3(8)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b. AIR-LAP1242AG-P-K9 (IOS ver. 12.3(11)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot seem to determine any difference between the two APs functionality as far as configuration options are considered.  I understand that IOS autonomous APs do not connect to WLCs (by default).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. I am able to configure RADIUS on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b. I am able to configure SSIDs on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c. I am able to assign an IP to both the APs for management&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions then: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can Lighwieght AP work independantly of the wireless LAN controllers?  The documentation says they cannot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Is it IOS dependant? i.e. can LAP be made to work like an autonomous AP using an appropriate IOS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. If LAP works just as IOS AP then why does Cisco offers them under different product IDs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lightweight-and-ios-ap/m-p/714739#M64921</guid>
      <dc:creator>magurwara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:54:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lightweight and IOS AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lightweight-and-ios-ap/m-p/714740#M64922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Muhammad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have done your homework here &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; Hopefully I can answer your questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can Lighwieght AP work independantly of the wireless LAN controllers? The documentation says they cannot. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The LWAPP AP (LAP) cannot operate independantly of the WLC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Is it IOS dependant? i.e. can LAP be made to work like an autonomous AP using an appropriate IOS? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, an LAP can be converted to Autonomous.Have a look at this doc;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reverting the Access Point Back to Autonomous Mode &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp161272" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp161272&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. If LAP works just as IOS AP then why does Cisco offers them under different product IDs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the difference is in ease of use and Installation only, seeing that the AP can be converted either way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:10:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/lightweight-and-ios-ap/m-p/714740#M64922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-11T12:10:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

