<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AP vs Wireless Bridge in AP mode in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156614#M66564</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between AP and Wireless Bridge in AP mode? Or, when to use AP like device and when Wireless Bridge in AP mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for cooperation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jovan M., CCNA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jmanevski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:38:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AP vs Wireless Bridge in AP mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156614#M66564</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the difference between AP and Wireless Bridge in AP mode? Or, when to use AP like device and when Wireless Bridge in AP mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for cooperation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jovan M., CCNA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156614#M66564</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmanevski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:38:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP vs Wireless Bridge in AP mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156615#M66565</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR350 as access points can be used to cover outdoor areas, since they have metal case for durability and plenum rating and an extended operating temperature rating for harsh environments &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other than that BR350 in AP mode is jus similar to AP350(not the pastic ones, the metal plenum rated) if you use for indoor coverage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From Cisco documentations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bridge as a rugged access point connected to the wired LAN. When you select Access Point, the bridge's Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) function is disabled. Figure 3-4 shows a bridge set up as a rugged access point. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps458/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007f77f.html#25614" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps458/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007f77f.html#25614&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps458/ps460/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps458/ps460/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156615#M66565</guid>
      <dc:creator>amitubale</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-11T18:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP vs Wireless Bridge in AP mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156616#M66567</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;use a BR350 as an AP if you want to have other bridges associating with it in addition to clients. bridges can't associate with APs only with Bridges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156616#M66567</guid>
      <dc:creator>tom.last</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-28T12:56:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AP vs Wireless Bridge in AP mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156617#M66569</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AP (Access point) mode:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; will allow you to add wireless access to&amp;nbsp; en existing router or switch. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Bridge mode: &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will&amp;nbsp; allow you to connect two or more networks or network devices separated&amp;nbsp; physically to each other wirelessly to make a connection, operating on&amp;nbsp; the 802.11 standard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 02:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ap-vs-wireless-bridge-in-ap-mode/m-p/156617#M66569</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmangat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-15T02:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

