<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WCS - Rouge Detection in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323322#M74752</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the ratings George.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-13T11:50:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WCS - Rouge Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323319#M74749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the WCS v5x have the ability to detect Rouge APs? Also, if&amp;nbsp; yes, does the WCS have the ability to generate Rogue Reports? We're looking to fully deploy WCS within our Autonomous AP fabric. However, the information we seek, will play a critical role to our decision. Lastly, we're not planning to upgrade Autonomous APs to LAPs. That will be a costly proposition. We have have close to 900 Autonomous APs.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323319#M74749</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jbautistkis_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T01:19:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS - Rouge Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323320#M74750</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The WLC can detect Rogue APs and the WCS just use the data the WLC sees.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have no idea how many LAPs you have but WCS cannot detect Rogues from Autonomous AP.&amp;nbsp; If you have, say a 100 license WCS, why not convert only 100 autonomous?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this answer your question?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323320#M74750</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-05T06:48:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS - Rouge Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323321#M74751</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think Leo just hit the money shot with that suggestion. Convert 100 aps and you have your (overlay system) at little cost. Other wise your other option is an Airtight / Airmagnet overlay. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5 stars Leo ... great suggestion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323321#M74751</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-05T15:33:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WCS - Rouge Detection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323322#M74752</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the ratings George.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-rouge-detection/m-p/1323322#M74752</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-13T11:50:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

