<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Philip, in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059617#M75629</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Philip,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your reply.&amp;nbsp;I do agree that this will definitely require huge bandwidth as all AP will tunnel back to the MX. Our client do have an existing PORTAL in placed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Follow up questions,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. May I know the concurrent users that MX600 can handle?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. When you say "it can support 5,000 concurrent AP tunnel" its means and it has something to do with MX600 Max VPN sessions capability?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:18:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Anthony David</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-23T16:18:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Meraki MX and MR | SSID with VPN: tunnel data to a concentrator settings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059615#M75627</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We&amp;nbsp;are planning to deploy more than 500 Meraki APs for a Free Public hotspot.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The reason why we use this settings is that we wanted to terminate MRs to a DSL internet line and can still provide services like DHCP, DNS and Portal that is behind the MX which is located inside our network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here's the high level call flow.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;WiFi users &amp;gt; open SSID (with VPN tunnel data to concentrator) MR APs &amp;gt; DSL router &amp;gt; Internet &amp;gt; MX &amp;gt; internal network (DHCP, DNS, PORTAL) &amp;gt; wifi user GW &amp;gt; FW &amp;gt; Public Internet&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When WiFi users connect to SSID,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. User will get an IP address from DHCP from internal network&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. User will then browse and gets redirected to a PORTAL&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. User will accept and agree some pages in PORTAL&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. User will then be connected to the Public Internet&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Here are my questions,&amp;nbsp;If I'm going to put Meraki MX600 as concentrator, then&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. What is my expected number of WiFi device that can tunnel in this open SSID? Is it 10000 as stated in Datasheet in Recommended Max Client?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. What is the recommended number of APs that can tunnel?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. What is the recommended number of network that can be used?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hoping on your expert advice on this one. Thank you so much.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059615#M75627</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Anthony David</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:54:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It will be a million times</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059616#M75628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It will be a million times easier if you use just the Meraki access points, and a third party portal service like&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.splashaccess.com/"&gt;Splash Access&lt;/A&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Trying to tunnel that many units back to a central location will require huge amounts of bandwidth and may be challenging to scale.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Yes, I expect it should be able to handle 10,000 users in total - not concurrently.&lt;BR /&gt;2. I believe it can support 5,000 concurrent access point tunnels.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 05:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059616#M75628</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-22T05:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Philip,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059617#M75629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Philip,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your reply.&amp;nbsp;I do agree that this will definitely require huge bandwidth as all AP will tunnel back to the MX. Our client do have an existing PORTAL in placed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Follow up questions,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. May I know the concurrent users that MX600 can handle?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. When you say "it can support 5,000 concurrent AP tunnel" its means and it has something to do with MX600 Max VPN sessions capability?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 16:18:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059617#M75629</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Anthony David</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-23T16:18:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1. Not sure.  A lot.  A</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059618#M75630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. Not sure. &amp;nbsp;A lot. &amp;nbsp;A substantial portion of the 10,000 users.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Yes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you considered using L2TPv3 mode? &amp;nbsp;When you do this, you have to terminate the connections on something like a Cisco ASR.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Client_Addressing_and_Bridging/L2TPv3_Concentration_for_SSIDs"&gt;https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Client_Addressing_and_Bridging/L2TPv3_Concentration_for_SSIDs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It will still be much simpler terminating them on an MX600, but I just mention it so you are aware of that option.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059618#M75630</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-23T20:26:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks again Philip.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059619#M75631</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks again Philip.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;About L2TPv3 /or EoGRE for SSIDs, I would love to test but I find no detailed documentation (technotes) regarding these setups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/meraki-mx-and-mr-ssid-with-vpn-tunnel-data-to-a-concentrator/m-p/3059619#M75631</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Anthony David</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-25T01:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

