topic SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast in Wireless

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

t.singletary — Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:35:29 GMT

SSID to Broadcast or not to Broadcast.

I know how each option works but which option should be used in a corporate environment. I'm sure there are viable reasons to use both but i guess i'm looking for best/standards practices.

Thanks,

Tim

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

pcroak — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:17:42 GMT

Hi Tim,

This decision primarily depends on the users that will be connecting to any given WLAN.

If you broadcast the SSID, users will not be required to configure a profile on their wireless supplicant to connect. This is commonly seen with guest networks for ease of use.

If you do not broadcast the SSID, a profile will be required on the devices to connect to the WLAN.

Not broadcasting the SSID does not really provide any real security -- a wireless sniffer can capture the SSID information. However it does hide your wireless network from a majority of wireless devices -- so they won't be attempting to connect automatically.

-Patrick Croak

Wireless TAC

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

Stephen Rodriguez — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:32:53 GMT

also, your windows machines will tend to join the 'broadcast' ssid by default, even over a configured/secure ssid. There is an option in WZC 'connect even if network is not broadcasting' that helps this situation.

Cheers,

Steve

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

George Stefanick — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:08:35 GMT

To Steve's point ...

If you have a guest network and broadcast your SSID expect to have a LARGE DHCP scope! Every wifi device that comes close to your network will get an IP address exhausting your DHCP scope. One way to fix that issue, turn off broadcast.

Also, no real security as Pat pointed out. AirMagnet and others use the "probe request" packet to sniff out hidden ssids, networks.

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

Leo Laohoo — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:19:40 GMT

If the question to broadcast or not to broadcast an SSID is based on security, then I don't recommend it. Potential wanna-be hackers will consider this as a challenge and might do more damage. As what George has mentioned, nearly every wireless sniffers can now identify non-broadcasting SSID. So this is a moot point.

One thing to consider, not every wireless NIC source code likes non-broadcasting SSID.

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

t.singletary — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:42:09 GMT

Thanks to everyone...

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

Leo Laohoo — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:08:44 GMT

Hey George,

Nice Blue Star!

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

Vinay Sharma — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:19:44 GMT

I agree with Leo . Congrats George

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

George Stefanick — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:22:00 GMT

Thanks man! BLUE looks good on me. I think! I need to get that fancy VIP like you have ! Thats my next stop!

SSID broadcast vs.non-broadcast

George Stefanick — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:22:38 GMT

Thanks Vinay !