<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WI-FI Alliance in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wi-fi-alliance/m-p/573170#M77445</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is BR1400 Model a WI-FI Alliance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have serched WI-FI certified products list on WI-FI web site,But i can't find BR1400 in the list.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yong1794</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T19:37:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WI-FI Alliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wi-fi-alliance/m-p/573170#M77445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is BR1400 Model a WI-FI Alliance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have serched WI-FI certified products list on WI-FI web site,But i can't find BR1400 in the list.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wi-fi-alliance/m-p/573170#M77445</guid>
      <dc:creator>yong1794</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T19:37:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WI-FI Alliance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wi-fi-alliance/m-p/573171#M77446</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know for a fact, but I suspect not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wi-Fi only covers APs. To operate as a bridge (especially one made for distance) the "normal" 802.11{abg} parameters have to be "stretched" to accommodate the longer delays and likelyhood of noise and other interference. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is why "wireless bridges" tend to operate as proprietary devices (i.e., you can't use a Cisco bridge (root or non-root) with some other manufacturer's similar product). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As such, it can't meet the WiFi specs for having "open, standard" operating protocols.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAIK, ther are no standards (yet?) for wireless bridges. This isn't just a "Cisco thing"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bridges acting as repeaters, and 'bridges' that associate with APs as a client are a different animal. These bridges will not talk to a wireless bridge that is setup for long range point-to-point (or point-to-multipoint) mode (root or non-root).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wi-fi-alliance/m-p/573171#M77446</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-18T02:18:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

