<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 1.  bandwidth should be in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997856#M82466</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;bandwidth should be controlled based on&amp;nbsp;venue/site, user &amp;amp; access-point level.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is not a wireless issue. &amp;nbsp;This can be done using CoS and policy map to map the amount of bandwidth the guest SSID can use. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Some users need to have limited time access. Some should have unlimited access.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not a wireless issue. &amp;nbsp;MS Active Directory can do this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. User should be able to extend their time if the timeout about to occur.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Uh, this is dumb. &amp;nbsp;Users can manage to restrict their time? &amp;nbsp;He he he ... FUNNY.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. There should be a portal to allow/restrict the bandwidth.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You're killing me, mate. &amp;nbsp;This is too funny! &amp;nbsp;Who came up with this idea?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; requirement to deploy traffic engineering for the guest wireless.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The words "traffic engineering"&amp;nbsp;makes it sound so "glamorous" when this is just a plain old, basic wireless design study. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-18T02:20:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Traffic engineering in Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997855#M82465</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have got a requirement to deploy traffic engineering for the guest wireless.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Conditions are&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;bandwidth should be controlled based on&amp;nbsp;venue/site, user &amp;amp; access-point level.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Some users need to have limited time access. Some should have unlimited access.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. User should be able to extend their time if the timeout about to occur.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. There should be a portal to allow/restrict the bandwidth.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I just checked all products. nothing seems to be supporting all features..Is there anything you can think of?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your help.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:39:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997855#M82465</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramesh rajendran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T12:39:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1.  bandwidth should be</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997856#M82466</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;bandwidth should be controlled based on&amp;nbsp;venue/site, user &amp;amp; access-point level.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is not a wireless issue. &amp;nbsp;This can be done using CoS and policy map to map the amount of bandwidth the guest SSID can use. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Some users need to have limited time access. Some should have unlimited access.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not a wireless issue. &amp;nbsp;MS Active Directory can do this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. User should be able to extend their time if the timeout about to occur.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Uh, this is dumb. &amp;nbsp;Users can manage to restrict their time? &amp;nbsp;He he he ... FUNNY.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. There should be a portal to allow/restrict the bandwidth.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You're killing me, mate. &amp;nbsp;This is too funny! &amp;nbsp;Who came up with this idea?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; requirement to deploy traffic engineering for the guest wireless.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The words "traffic engineering"&amp;nbsp;makes it sound so "glamorous" when this is just a plain old, basic wireless design study. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997856#M82466</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-18T02:20:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1.  bandwidth should be</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997857#M82467</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;bandwidth should be controlled based on&amp;nbsp;venue/site, user &amp;amp; access-point level.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is not a wireless issue. &amp;nbsp;This can be done using CoS and policy map to map the amount of bandwidth the guest SSID can use. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 90px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Some management softwares like Clearpass can monitor the bandwidth at user level. I just want to understand whether we can do it using cisco technologies.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Some users need to have limited time access. Some should have unlimited access.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not a wireless issue. &amp;nbsp;MS Active Directory can do this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Is there any management systems like Cisco Prime/ISE can do this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. User should be able to extend their time if the timeout about to occur.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Uh, this is dumb. &amp;nbsp;Users can manage to restrict their time? &amp;nbsp;He he he ... FUNNY.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It was typo. Should be Admins&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. There should be a portal to allow/restrict the bandwidth.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You're killing me, mate. &amp;nbsp;This is too funny! &amp;nbsp;Who came up with this idea?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Its a typical requirement where some sites need more bandwidth &amp;amp; some or not. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;requirement to deploy traffic engineering for the guest wireless.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997857#M82467</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramesh rajendran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-18T12:19:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is there any management</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997858#M82468</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there any management systems like Cisco Prime/ISE can do this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The design requirement does not make any logical sense. &amp;nbsp;So there are some GUEST users who have unlimited access and some GUEST who have limited time access? &amp;nbsp;Who makes that decision that Guest 12345 has unlimited access and Guest 54321 has only 30 minutes? &amp;nbsp;How to police that Guest 12345 didn't share the password to someone else? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sys Admin? &amp;nbsp;Someone is going to hire a Sys Admin to make this decision? &amp;nbsp;Again, the design defies real-world scenario. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It was typo. Should be Admins&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Same question above, someone hires an "admin" to make low-level policy? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Its a typical requirement where some sites need more bandwidth &amp;amp; some or not. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Look here, the entire design does NOT make any logical sense. &amp;nbsp;Take the requirement one by one and it'll work. &amp;nbsp;It can be done. &amp;nbsp;Put them all in one big package and this entire thing looks like a mutant. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Design "work", even though someone likes to incorrectly call it as a "traffic engineering", isn't just say "yes sir" to the client. &amp;nbsp;It also takes common sense into account and, sometimes, the client needs to be told to get off their medication. &amp;nbsp;This is one case. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a good idea what the client wants but it can't be done by using one big fat box or one big solution. &amp;nbsp;What you're asking needs several parts and some of them doesn't have the "Cisco" logo on it. &amp;nbsp;This isn't as simple as those requirement you've put in. &amp;nbsp;The client also needs to articulate clearly what they want and what they want to see.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:40:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/traffic-engineering-in-wireless/m-p/2997858#M82468</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-18T12:40:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

