<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Anybody have any idea? Are in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928387#M82474</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anybody have any idea? Are these counters causing WiFi slowness performance issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Disable the 802.11b radio and see if the performance improves.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-02T22:00:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless slow performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928386#M82473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have Cisco AP 1242. When I started something to download from Internet maximum downloading speed goes upto 16 Mbps even I have 40 Mbps link from ISP. While troubleshooting, I monitored AP fastethernet interface pointing towards WLC and radio interface, and found some error counters were increment while downloading. Following are some outputs:-&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AP# show interface Dot1 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Input queue: 0/1048/75/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 85&lt;BR /&gt; Queueing strategy: fifo&lt;BR /&gt; Output queue: 0/30 (size/max)&lt;BR /&gt; 30 second input rate 8000 bits/sec, 8 packets/sec&lt;BR /&gt; 30 second output rate 2000 bits/sec, 2 packets/sec&lt;BR /&gt; 3604753 packets input, 464864218 bytes, 0 no buffer&lt;BR /&gt; 3959188 packets output, 616251261 bytes, 0 underruns&lt;BR /&gt; 27719 output errors, 0 collisions, 4 interface resets&lt;BR /&gt; 0 unknown protocol drops&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AP# show interface Fastethernet0&lt;BR /&gt; Input queue: 41/1048/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0&lt;BR /&gt; Queueing strategy: fifo&lt;BR /&gt; Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)&lt;BR /&gt; 30 second input rate 6000 bits/sec, 8 packets/sec&lt;BR /&gt; 30 second output rate 22000 bits/sec, 17 packets/sec&lt;BR /&gt; 7286764 packets input, 656786273 bytes&lt;BR /&gt; Received 128810 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles&lt;BR /&gt; 2347545 packets output, 424028626 bytes, 0 underruns&lt;BR /&gt; 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets&lt;BR /&gt; 11284 unknown protocol drops&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Question- Even the fastethernet interface utilization was very low then why packets were buffered in input Queue?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another "show controller" output has been taken. In Dot 11 statistics section, CRC errors,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;CTS not received, Retries,&amp;nbsp;Invalid header etc counters were&amp;nbsp;increment while downloading. Following is the output:-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;DOT11 Statistics (Cumulative Total/Last 5 Seconds):&lt;BR /&gt;RECEIVER &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; TRANSMITTER&lt;BR /&gt;Host Rx K Bytes: 3080236 / 101 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Host Tx K Bytes: 505274 / 5216&lt;BR /&gt;Unicasts Rx: 16142436 / 1779 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Unicasts Tx: 67365332 / 3560&lt;BR /&gt;Unicasts to host: 16142436 / 1779 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Unicasts by host: 23527967 / 3534&lt;BR /&gt;Broadcasts Rx: 185864473 / 148 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Broadcasts Tx: 86691313 / 98&lt;BR /&gt;Beacons Rx: 60486095 / 68 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Beacons Tx: 86691311 / 98&lt;BR /&gt;Broadcasts to host:92830298 / 74 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Broadcasts by host: 2 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Multicasts Rx: 375269 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Multicasts Tx: 222620 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Multicasts to host: 0 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Multicasts by host: 222620 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt Packets Rx: 32422617 / 6 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Mgmt Packets Tx: 43480383 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS received: 5 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;RTS transmitted: 2274275 / 86&lt;BR /&gt;Duplicate frames: 490387 / 59 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;CTS not received: 1058802 / 11&lt;BR /&gt;CRC errors: 101210915 / 174 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Unicast Fragments Tx: 66970191 / 3536&lt;BR /&gt;WEP errors: 886 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Retries: 9272649 / 2071&lt;BR /&gt;Buffer full: 0 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Packets one retry: 2964819 / 732&lt;BR /&gt;Host buffer full: 0 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Packets &amp;gt; 1 retry: 2160972 / 499&lt;BR /&gt;Header CRC errors: 46091 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Protocol defers: 13279037 / 431&lt;BR /&gt;Invalid header: 1534748 / 22 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Energy detect defers: 15200490 / 14&lt;BR /&gt;Length invalid: 0 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Jammer detected: 336 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Incomplete fragments: 30 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Packets aged: 0 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Concats: 0 / 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Tx Concats: 0 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 1.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 93405277 / 74 Tx Packets: 51729 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 2126460368 / 14960 Tx Bytes: 20010463 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 151775 / 0 Data Retries: 215567 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 2.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 260512 / 0 Tx Packets: 22105 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 35130734 / 0 Tx Bytes: 12298677 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 34439 / 0 Data Retries: 88357 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 5.5&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 484293 / 0 Tx Packets: 183769 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 83138985 / 0 Tx Bytes: 224332357 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 43846 / 0 Data Retries: 168707 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 11.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 765181 / 0 Tx Packets: 212643 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 87144682 / 0 Tx Bytes: 224945368 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 55067 / 0 Data Retries: 296399 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 6.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 378998 / 0 Tx Packets: 148977 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 23148640 / 0 Tx Bytes: 143801572 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 37528 / 0 Data Retries: 182116 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 9.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 67255 / 0 Tx Packets: 156533 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 42341496 / 0 Tx Bytes: 156315093 / 0&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 30721 / 0 Data Retries: 169733 / 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 12.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 250570 / 0 Tx Packets: 573978 / 5&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 84769975 / 0 Tx Bytes: 655506995 / 7540&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 74659 / 2 Data Retries: 612798 / 31&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 18.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 1092528 / 0 Tx Packets: 930207 / 43&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 258436745 / 0 Tx Bytes: 1134151231 / 64844&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 97805 / 3 Data Retries: 1484102 / 203&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 24.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 1510941 / 3 Tx Packets: 2307663 / 120&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 443365624 / 144 Tx Bytes: 2896935713 / 180960&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 2 / 0 Data Retries: 1535184 / 388&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 36.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 2057633 / 2 Tx Packets: 7214023 / 280&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 820644775 / 96 Tx Bytes: 1126230387 / 422240&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 7 / 0 Data Retries: 1806433 / 604&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 48.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 2135521 / 527 Tx Packets: 5614880 / 2645&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 614911862 / 25394 Tx Bytes: 2931077826 / 3980065&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 0 / 0 Data Retries: 1375588 / 706&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RATE 54.0&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Packets: 6564025 / 1247 Tx Packets: 6064532 / 441&lt;BR /&gt;Rx Bytes: 666253762 / 63282 Tx Bytes: 3434959023 / 646344&lt;BR /&gt;RTS Retries: 0 / 0 Data Retries: 811816 / 134&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anybody have any idea? Are these counters causing WiFi slowness performance issue? Please reply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:32:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928386#M82473</guid>
      <dc:creator>singhkulbir29881</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T12:32:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anybody have any idea? Are</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928387#M82474</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anybody have any idea? Are these counters causing WiFi slowness performance issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Disable the 802.11b radio and see if the performance improves.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928387#M82474</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-02T22:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Leo Laohoo,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928388#M82475</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Leo Laohoo,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Access point have two radio interfaces&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AP# sh int dot11Radio0&lt;BR /&gt;Dot11Radio0 is up, line protocol is up &lt;BR /&gt; Hardware is 802.11G Radio,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AP# sh int dot11Radio 1&lt;BR /&gt;Dot11Radio1 is up, line protocol is up &lt;BR /&gt; Hardware is 802.11A Radio,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As the output says the interfaces are 802.11G &amp;amp; 802.11A, which radio you are talking about to disable?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:18:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928388#M82475</guid>
      <dc:creator>singhkulbir29881</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T16:18:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928389#M82476</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Disabling the 802.11b rates will increase the overall performance of the network. To do this you have to disable the following rates: 1, 2, 5.5 and 11. These are on the 2.4 GHz band, so the change has to be done on radio 0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In addition, I want to make sure you are not comparing wireless rates to wired speeds. You mentioned that you have a 40 Mbps connection from your ISP but this does not mean that you will have that rate on wireless since these are two different technologies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wireless uses the air as its medium and has to share it with all clients which means that the available "speed" will be devided between all the clients. Also, WiFi transmissions are half-duplex; every radio can only receive or transmit a frame, cannot do both at the same time. Today's technology allows to have transmissions and receptions at the same time but with different streams (and other technical stuff) but at the end of the day it continues to be half duplex.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, depending on the air quality, quantity of clients, configuration, clients drivers etc you will see a reduction on your performance and cannot be compared to wired.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want a more accurate test for wireless only you can use iperf:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/12068771/iperf-test-measuring-throughputspeed-wlan-client&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this information helps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Marco Gonzalez&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928389#M82476</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco Gonzalez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T16:30:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Marco Gonzalez,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928390#M82477</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/users/marcgon2" title="View user profile." class="username" lang="" about="/users/marcgon2" typeof="sioc:UserAccount" property="foaf:name" datatype=""&gt;Marco Gonzalez&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reply. I understand what you want to say but even if a single client is associated, throughput is same (means 16Mbps)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What does these counter (&lt;SPAN&gt; CRC errors,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CTS not received, Retries,&amp;nbsp;Invalid header etc&lt;/SPAN&gt;) increment means?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are the possible reasons for these counters increment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928390#M82477</guid>
      <dc:creator>singhkulbir29881</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T17:01:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Disable radio interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928391#M82478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Disable radio interface Dot110.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What does these counter (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; CRC errors,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CTS not received, Retries,&amp;nbsp;Invalid header etc&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;) increment means?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Wireless transmission always operate in half duplex: &amp;nbsp;One talks and everyone else waits for their turn. &amp;nbsp;CRC, CTS, etc ... these errors will always increment when the wireless environment is either noisy or too much co-channel interference.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-slow-performance-issue/m-p/2928391#M82478</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T21:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

