<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IP Addressing on High Density Wireless in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915482#M84201</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys a very easy question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is better? or if exist another best-practices please tell me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;consider the fact only 1 ssid, 2000 user on same building&amp;nbsp; (4 areas, not separete areas, they are very close)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.- one network mask /21? for whole building?. effect: I think this generate too much traffic, broadcast etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.- 4 network mask /24 each one. using vlan id group and assign one vlan x area?, effect: roming wil be at layer 3, and will be experience renewal ip and a lot conect/disconect problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks and regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sdeltoro1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T05:11:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915482#M84201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys a very easy question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is better? or if exist another best-practices please tell me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;consider the fact only 1 ssid, 2000 user on same building&amp;nbsp; (4 areas, not separete areas, they are very close)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.- one network mask /21? for whole building?. effect: I think this generate too much traffic, broadcast etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.- 4 network mask /24 each one. using vlan id group and assign one vlan x area?, effect: roming wil be at layer 3, and will be experience renewal ip and a lot conect/disconect problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks and regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915482#M84201</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdeltoro1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T05:11:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915483#M84202</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will get difference answers from different folks, for sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I manage a large WLAN and have 3,000 client in the same subnet and its a voice vlan at that. I dont have any issues. The WLC will proxy the broadcast, so broadcast are never on the wireless medium. However, if I were to have deisgned this network, I would have done /22 and ap groups or a dynamic vlan. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915483#M84202</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-22T05:47:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915484#M84203</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just like what George said, you'll get different answers from different people.&lt;BR /&gt;We have couple of networks all are /20. All are fine (all are data).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would study it carefully about how many users would possibly roam from an area to another before choosing. But if everything is OK I think I will end up using one subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amjad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:31:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915484#M84203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amjad Abdullah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-23T07:31:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915485#M84204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; thanks Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I will implement using one subnet, what version is your WLC and if the broadcast is enable for default or must be disabled?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915485#M84204</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdeltoro1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-23T15:44:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915486#M84205</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there are no applications that needs broadcast then I prefer to keep it disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 08:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915486#M84205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amjad Abdullah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-28T08:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915487#M84206</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use Interface group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 07:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915487#M84206</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saravanan Lakshmanan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-04T07:35:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Addressing on High Density Wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915488#M84207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is also a good solution to make smaller subnets on same WLAN rathe than mapping the WLAN to same big subnet/VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/ip-addressing-on-high-density-wireless/m-p/1915488#M84207</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amjad Abdullah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-04T10:31:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

