<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 3rd party wireless bridge in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859407#M84373</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an outside vendor using a Moog/Videolarm bridge device for security gate access. The moog/videolarm ap is set as a transparent bridge connecting to an ssid we have set up for them. The device connects with the correct credentials, but the black box connected to the bridge responds to a ping sometimes. I set a constant ping to the 2 devices, the ap/bridge and the black box: the bridge reponds for 25 pings then stops and the black box responds 25 pings and then the ap/bridge starts responding. Any suggestions thoughts, I really don't want to put up a bridge just for one device.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rschwart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T04:37:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3rd party wireless bridge</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859407#M84373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an outside vendor using a Moog/Videolarm bridge device for security gate access. The moog/videolarm ap is set as a transparent bridge connecting to an ssid we have set up for them. The device connects with the correct credentials, but the black box connected to the bridge responds to a ping sometimes. I set a constant ping to the 2 devices, the ap/bridge and the black box: the bridge reponds for 25 pings then stops and the black box responds 25 pings and then the ap/bridge starts responding. Any suggestions thoughts, I really don't want to put up a bridge just for one device.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859407#M84373</guid>
      <dc:creator>rschwart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T04:37:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3rd party wireless bridge</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859408#M84374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;rschwart,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using a lightweight access point and a controller as your root AP in this setup, then what I think you're seeing is that transparent bridging not working correctly because of the strict 1:1 MAC:IP relationship in a client connection record. With a root AP in local mode, the recommended and cleanest way around this on the client/bridged side is to use a WGB. Here is what Cisco has to say about client bridges and WGBs in the CUWN environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.0/configuration/guide/c70lwap.html#wp1144634" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.0/configuration/guide/c70lwap.html#wp1144634&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Despite this, you may have some other ways around this problem, and one or more of the following options may work for you:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 0px;"&gt;﻿&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Disable the IP-MAC address binding check on the controller CLI:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 60px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "&gt;wlc&amp;gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;config network ip-mac-binding disable&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 0px;"&gt;﻿&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 0px;"&gt;﻿&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If the option is available, configure the Moog/Videolarm device as an L3 routed device (i.e., a wireless router). Configure a new network on the "LAN" side of the Moog/Videolarm device and put your black box on that network. Use a static IP or DHCP to always assign the same IP to the "WAN" side of the Moog/Videolarm and then put a route behind the controller on your upstream L3 device to route all of your "LAN" traffic to that static/reserved "WAN" IP.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Change your lightweight root AP to bridge mode and when the HREAP tab appears in AP configuration mode, make it a Root AP. This will tell the controller that the 1:1 relationship of MAC:IP no longer applies. I'm not 100% sure of the ramifications otherwise (client access, RRM) of this change, and your Moog/Videolarm may not even be able to associate, but it could be worth trying just to see if you get a change in behavior.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If the option is available, configure MAC cloning of the black box on the Moog/Videolarm device. This way the controller only sees one MAC on the other side of the bridge link (even though you have two separate devices).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859408#M84374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin Kurynny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-21T17:42:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3rd party wireless bridge</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859409#M84375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help. This did resolve our issue and everything works for our vendor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859409#M84375</guid>
      <dc:creator>rschwart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-05T20:58:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3rd party wireless bridge</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859410#M84376</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;rschwart,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did the vendor tell you which method they used to fix the issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for marking answered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859410#M84376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin Kurynny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-05T21:55:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3rd party wireless bridge</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859411#M84377</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Sorry, I should have been more clear, I used the cli wlc&amp;gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;config network ip-mac-binding disable. &lt;/STRONG&gt;Not the best solution, but it works. I only disabled it on the WLC that controls the ap. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/3rd-party-wireless-bridge/m-p/1859411#M84377</guid>
      <dc:creator>rschwart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-05T22:48:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

