<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless G vs Wireless B in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542700#M84974</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you're mixing some concepts, let me clarify point by point :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-11n allows speed up to 144 or 300mbps (depending what features you go for) so best speeds are with 11n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-The fact that there are other wireless networks where you are is the source of interference. No matter if they are b or g .... Several wireless networks in the same channel = interferers and less bandwitdh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Regarding the interaction of wireless B and G, it's actually you being a pain for your neighbors &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; When 11G devices hear 11B devices in the neighborhood, they have to take special precautions not to freak them out and it slows down the G network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So no impact on your B clients but the G clients of your neighbors are slower than they should be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-When you mention "moving to wireless G or N", be aware than changing your access points won't change anything if your handheld scanners are still 11B. Very little improvements unless you change all your clients to G or N.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this clarifies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nicolas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;===&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't forget to rate answers that you find useful&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nicolas Darchis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-11T10:30:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless G vs Wireless B</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542699#M84973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the wiki documentation I found this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wireless B :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- modulation: DSSS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- indoor range 38 m&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- outdoor range 140 m&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data rates: 5.5, 11 mbits&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wireless G:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- modulation: DSSS, OFDM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- indoor range 38 m&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- outdoor range 140 m&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data rates: 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 Mbits&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can conclude that the connectivity distance is the same but the speed is different , Wireless G is better because it also uses OFDM...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When there are a lot of other wireless G networks active in the same area, and I use a wireless B network, is it true that my connection interference is a lot worse. Should it be a solution if I switch to a wireless G? Or do I need Wireless N for the best speed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;background information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a lot of handheld scanners, they connect with wireless B to an access point, but they are used in a public area with many many other wireless networks... I think that more and more networks are switching to wireless G and because of the interference clients (my handheld devices) gets disconnected. I am planning to switch them also to wireless G but I not 100% sure it will fix my problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Stijn&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 02:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542699#M84973</guid>
      <dc:creator>svandevoorde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T02:31:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless G vs Wireless B</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542700#M84974</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you're mixing some concepts, let me clarify point by point :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-11n allows speed up to 144 or 300mbps (depending what features you go for) so best speeds are with 11n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-The fact that there are other wireless networks where you are is the source of interference. No matter if they are b or g .... Several wireless networks in the same channel = interferers and less bandwitdh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Regarding the interaction of wireless B and G, it's actually you being a pain for your neighbors &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; When 11G devices hear 11B devices in the neighborhood, they have to take special precautions not to freak them out and it slows down the G network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So no impact on your B clients but the G clients of your neighbors are slower than they should be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-When you mention "moving to wireless G or N", be aware than changing your access points won't change anything if your handheld scanners are still 11B. Very little improvements unless you change all your clients to G or N.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this clarifies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nicolas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;===&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't forget to rate answers that you find useful&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542700#M84974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicolas Darchis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-11T10:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless G vs Wireless B</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542701#M84975</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for replying Nicolas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I can conclude the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- When I use my handheld devices with 11B again in a Congested Area with lots of WIFI's&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The impact of interference is the total of WIFI's connected to the same single channel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It doesn't matter to switch to 11G or 11N to change the interference impact (Probably 11N on the 5Ghz network does change the interference impact)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;==&amp;gt; When I switch to the most free WIFI channel in the 2.4 Ghz network, the 11G interference will not be better then 11B interference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stijn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542701#M84975</guid>
      <dc:creator>svandevoorde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-13T14:05:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless G vs Wireless B</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542702#M84976</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;11n is a special case as it may also work on 2 channels at the same time. But that only increases the risk of interferences (twice the amount of B/g devices interfering). But you're globally right about the fact that it's the amount of devices talking on the same channel that represents the problem and not particularly their speed (b, g or n).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mix of speeds is impacting for higher speeds (g/n) since they have to adapt to the presence of lower speed devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nicolas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-g-vs-wireless-b/m-p/1542702#M84976</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicolas Darchis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-13T14:08:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

