<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wireless Clients in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-clients/m-p/1253730#M85641</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to setup the clients on our network with the Intel Wireless Utility package and in the administrative tool gives an option to setup Roaming Aggressiveness and i am not quite sure which option to use:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Default: Balanced between not roaming and performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Â· Lowest: Your WiFi client will not roam unless significant link quality degradation occurs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Â· Highest: Your WiFi client continuously tracks the link quality and, if any degradation occurs, it tries to find and roam to a better access point&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Victor Fabian</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:46:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-clients/m-p/1253730#M85641</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to setup the clients on our network with the Intel Wireless Utility package and in the administrative tool gives an option to setup Roaming Aggressiveness and i am not quite sure which option to use:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Default: Balanced between not roaming and performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Â· Lowest: Your WiFi client will not roam unless significant link quality degradation occurs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Â· Highest: Your WiFi client continuously tracks the link quality and, if any degradation occurs, it tries to find and roam to a better access point&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-clients/m-p/1253730#M85641</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor Fabian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-clients/m-p/1253731#M85642</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your own benefit I would test on your own a client in the low mid and high level of roaming agressivness, so you can see for yourself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have our 2,000+ clients on the Intel with HIGH aggressive roaming and they work well. I did some testing with clients on mid and low and they didn't to bad either.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have clients jumping to quick then you may want to tune it down. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-clients/m-p/1253731#M85642</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T00:31:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

