<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: wireless&amp;headache in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235929#M87728</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes but please note that they did not use the same frequency band. AP use 2,4G band &amp;gt; mobile phone cellular.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 05:53:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>o.hassairi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-10-18T05:53:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>wireless&amp;headache</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235927#M87726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; i noticed that every time i use the cisco AP350 ((50mW) 2.4G 11Mbps) i have a headache :-((&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;did any one notice the same problem !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 16:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235927#M87726</guid>
      <dc:creator>o.hassairi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T16:05:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wireless&amp;headache</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235928#M87727</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No. A mobile phone typically puts out up to 4 Watts EIRP from a small omni. Your microwaves leakage is rated at 100mW (cheap ones a lot higher - but who cares for $60? :P), if you get a headache at 50mW, your gonna have a brain tumor from defrosting the turkey.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235928#M87727</guid>
      <dc:creator>plates</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-17T23:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wireless&amp;headache</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235929#M87728</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes but please note that they did not use the same frequency band. AP use 2,4G band &amp;gt; mobile phone cellular.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 05:53:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235929#M87728</guid>
      <dc:creator>o.hassairi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-18T05:53:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wireless&amp;headache</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235930#M87730</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The specific absorption rate as stated by the fcc for acceptable levels is 1.6 watts/kilogram...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, in the words of an illustrious wireless instructor I know...  "It takes a thousand years to fry a chicken at 100 mW"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-headache/m-p/235930#M87730</guid>
      <dc:creator>dsidley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-21T15:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

