<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: cisco wireless in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179386#M87869</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks Alot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 05:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rzcisco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-12-16T05:35:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>cisco wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179384#M87867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello engineers ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm wondering if cisco manufacture wireless equipments in the scale of kilometers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for instance we have been offered a project in which there is some wireless &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;links goes as high as 35km and minimum 2mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to make sure whether cisco has these kind of wireless solution or not ?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;u'r comments are mostly appreciated . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179384#M87867</guid>
      <dc:creator>rzcisco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:24:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cisco wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179385#M87868</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco have wireless solution (wireless Bridge)which can cover 25 miles with clear line of sight. (40kilometers as 1.6Xmiles=kilometers) so you can calculate the range of kilometer that cisco bridge can cover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it really depends what you want to do exactly..Bridges have more distance coverage interms of kilometers and miles, Access Point is for indoor use to connect wireless clients..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can visit following link for more on cisco's wireless LAN products&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For wireless solutions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/44/solutions/network/wireless.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/44/solutions/network/wireless.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179385#M87868</guid>
      <dc:creator>tepatel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-12-15T02:49:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cisco wireless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179386#M87869</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks Alot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 05:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-wireless/m-p/179386#M87869</guid>
      <dc:creator>rzcisco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-12-16T05:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

