topic Re: RG-6 for 1300 in Wireless https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rg-6-for-1300/m-p/542969#M94244 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>No, though a high-quality quad-shield flavor would be my first choice. </P><P></P><P>Be advised that if the cables are too long, you may end up with marginal operation: You can drop enough voltage such that the unit comes up, but under an operational load, there is not enough power, and the unit flakes out.</P><P></P><P>Getting the best quality cable you can is recommended. Make sure it is properly terminated; bad termination can also introduce all sorts of glitchy errors and can possibly roast some vital parts.</P><P></P><P>Good Luck</P><P></P><P>Scott</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:11:42 GMT scottmac 2006-08-02T15:11:42Z RG-6 for 1300 https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rg-6-for-1300/m-p/542968#M94243 <P>We want to make a longer dual RG-6, is there any special type that we need for this?</P> Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:46:36 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rg-6-for-1300/m-p/542968#M94243 pcpolofnw 2021-07-04T19:46:36Z Re: RG-6 for 1300 https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rg-6-for-1300/m-p/542969#M94244 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>No, though a high-quality quad-shield flavor would be my first choice. </P><P></P><P>Be advised that if the cables are too long, you may end up with marginal operation: You can drop enough voltage such that the unit comes up, but under an operational load, there is not enough power, and the unit flakes out.</P><P></P><P>Getting the best quality cable you can is recommended. Make sure it is properly terminated; bad termination can also introduce all sorts of glitchy errors and can possibly roast some vital parts.</P><P></P><P>Good Luck</P><P></P><P>Scott</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:11:42 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/rg-6-for-1300/m-p/542969#M94244 scottmac 2006-08-02T15:11:42Z