<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 802.11n ratification in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325287#M94401</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a member of the IEEE Standards Association.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dennischolmes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-18T12:30:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>802.11n ratification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325285#M94399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A quick update for those of you who might not know. 802.11n has been approved by the IEEE taskgroup N and has been moved for a September vote in RevCom. This means that .11n is really close to full ratification and should be fully ratified by year end.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:57:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325285#M94399</guid>
      <dc:creator>dennischolmes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T00:57:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n ratification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325286#M94400</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's pretty amazing news, thanks for sharing!  How did you get the inside scoop?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325286#M94400</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeff.kish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T12:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n ratification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325287#M94401</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a member of the IEEE Standards Association.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325287#M94401</guid>
      <dc:creator>dennischolmes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T12:30:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n ratification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325288#M94402</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dennis,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for this great "heads-up"! +5 points for taking the time out of your busy schedule to keep us updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325288#M94402</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Huffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-19T11:47:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n ratification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325289#M94403</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Dennis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know the difference between The Cisco implementation of 802.11n Draft and the IEEE 802.11n standard. ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;F.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325289#M94403</guid>
      <dc:creator>francois</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-24T17:53:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.11n ratification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325290#M94404</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mandatory sections of the .11n standard is fully supported as far as I know by the Cisco gear. There are some things that Cisco doesn't do yet like 3x3 radios etc that are optional pieces of the standard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/802-11n-ratification/m-p/1325290#M94404</guid>
      <dc:creator>dennischolmes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-24T17:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

