<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WLC failover in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1095998#M9506</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two WLC 4000 configured as failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does the configuration synchronize between the two WLCs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>youssef_1985</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:55:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLC failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1095998#M9506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two WLC 4000 configured as failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does the configuration synchronize between the two WLCs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1095998#M9506</guid>
      <dc:creator>youssef_1985</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:55:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1095999#M9507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No it doesn't sync configuration.... you need to configure each wlc and make sure that both are in the same mobility group in order for the ap's to know of both wlc's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would need to configure the access points with a primary, secondary or tertiary wlc, in order for that ap to know which wlc it should be joined with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1095999#M9507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-26T15:18:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1096000#M9508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks fella&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1096000#M9508</guid>
      <dc:creator>youssef_1985</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-26T20:19:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1096001#M9509</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is also not a transperant failover since ap's will have to join the secondary or tertiary wlc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-failover/m-p/1096001#M9509</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-26T20:23:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

