<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CAPWAP QOS  in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175939#M95150</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Capwap control traffic is only UDP 5246 &amp;amp; 5247.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-09T14:23:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CAPWAP QOS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175938#M95149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Community,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm currently reviewing our QoS policy (WAN) and would like to add CAPWAP traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;We have 2 central WLCs (5508, 7.2.110.3) and about 100 AP's (mainly 3600) across 10 sites running HREAP mode.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Guest access is centrally switched, where all others are locally switched.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The goal is just to add CAPWAP 'control' traffic to our WAN QoS policy, while the centrally switched for our guest wifi still should be handled as best effort.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any way to separate this..or is ALL traffic communicating through CAPWAP ports 5246/5247?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Stefan&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:42:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175938#M95149</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stefan Engel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:42:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAPWAP QOS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175939#M95150</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Capwap control traffic is only UDP 5246 &amp;amp; 5247.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175939#M95150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-09T14:23:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAPWAP QOS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175940#M95151</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a traffic study. It's lwapp but still a good guide to reference.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_white_paper09186a0080901caa.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_white_paper09186a0080901caa.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175940#M95151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-09T14:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAPWAP QOS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175941#M95152</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope this is going to be helpful:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Mobility/emob41dg/ch5_QoS.html#wp1022502" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Mobility/emob41dg/ch5_QoS.html#wp1022502&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is about lwapp, but capwap is almost the same concept.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;Amjad&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:01:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175941#M95152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amjad Abdullah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-09T17:01:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAPWAP QOS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175942#M95153</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will add udp 5246 (CAPWAP control channel)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-qos/m-p/2175942#M95153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stefan Engel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-10T03:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

