<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CAPWAP tunnel through NAT interface in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751564#M95202</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if anyone has tried this but are there any complications with connecting a lightweight AP through a NAT'd interface back to the WLC?&amp;nbsp; I know I'll have to open 5246 and 5247, but are there any other issues that I should be aware of?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ewood2624</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:35:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CAPWAP tunnel through NAT interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751564#M95202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if anyone has tried this but are there any complications with connecting a lightweight AP through a NAT'd interface back to the WLC?&amp;nbsp; I know I'll have to open 5246 and 5247, but are there any other issues that I should be aware of?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751564#M95202</guid>
      <dc:creator>ewood2624</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CAPWAP tunnel through NAT interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751565#M95203</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this specific to office extends ? I have an AP NAT'd with CAPWAP and I have no issues. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751565#M95203</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-16T16:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CAPWAP tunnel through NAT interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751566#M95204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; We have a neighboring hospital where some of our docs want to set up a clinic using their iPads back to our network.&amp;nbsp; Right now, we have a NAT'd interface from their network to ours and I haven't been able to test setting up an AP through a NAT interface.&amp;nbsp; I forgot about Office Extends and now remember from your Twitter updates from CL11.&amp;nbsp; I'll probably go that route.&amp;nbsp; Are there any issues that may come up from using Office Extends?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751566#M95204</guid>
      <dc:creator>ewood2624</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-16T21:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CAPWAP tunnel through NAT interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751567#M95205</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;O/E is more for the remote home worker and doesnt support a number of things like roaming etc. If you have a small office (like 1 ap) size o/e could be an option, but not likley. There are limitaitions on how many wifi clients can attach to the AP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would look at HREAP. HREAP is designed for small remote locations and will allow you to local or central switch the traffic. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You ever do hreap ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/capwap-tunnel-through-nat-interface/m-p/1751567#M95205</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-16T23:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

