<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Security risk NAT in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/security-risk-nat/m-p/3312717#M965</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you think, that it is security risk to make static nat from private IP to public IP ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone can access to this public address. Allowed protocols will be&amp;nbsp; https, ftp, smtp, pop3, imap.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jaro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:07:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Security risk NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/security-risk-nat/m-p/3312717#M965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;do you think, that it is security risk to make static nat from private IP to public IP ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone can access to this public address. Allowed protocols will be&amp;nbsp; https, ftp, smtp, pop3, imap.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/security-risk-nat/m-p/3312717#M965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jaro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:07:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security risk NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/security-risk-nat/m-p/3312777#M967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- The security risk these days is not so much looked at from a L3 perspective , but more from application related security; modern firewalls will block malicious apps (used over http) for instance and much more.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; At lease you should have a modern firewall.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/security-risk-nat/m-p/3312777#M967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T12:30:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

