<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cabling/Connections in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cabling-connections/m-p/159538#M97145</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can see the specs of those cables here&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps469/products_data_sheet09186a0080092285.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps469/products_data_sheet09186a0080092285.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will see that CAB020LL-R has a transmison loss of 1.3Db and CAB050LL-R has 3.4Db loss&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if you had these together you get 4.7Db loss this does not take into account loss through adpater connectors &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AIR-CAB100ULL-R is 100Ft and has a loss of 4.4db   which would be a much better option even though it gives you 30ft more than you wanted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:36:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-02-12T23:36:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cabling/Connections</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cabling-connections/m-p/159537#M97144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What extra loss is added if you  interconnect a CAB020LL-R and a CAB050LL-R? Since these cables come with Male/Female TNC connectors. Can you not connect them tohgether to get a 70' foot cable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:30:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cabling-connections/m-p/159537#M97144</guid>
      <dc:creator>bob.forster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:30:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cabling/Connections</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cabling-connections/m-p/159538#M97145</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can see the specs of those cables here&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps469/products_data_sheet09186a0080092285.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps469/products_data_sheet09186a0080092285.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will see that CAB020LL-R has a transmison loss of 1.3Db and CAB050LL-R has 3.4Db loss&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if you had these together you get 4.7Db loss this does not take into account loss through adpater connectors &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AIR-CAB100ULL-R is 100Ft and has a loss of 4.4db   which would be a much better option even though it gives you 30ft more than you wanted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:36:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cabling-connections/m-p/159538#M97145</guid>
      <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-02-12T23:36:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

