<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ACS? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-acs/m-p/650987#M98885</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, Cisco will be supporting and enhancing ACS for a long time. They have been adding support for NAC and other new features, so I find it to be the most robust option when using Cisco equipment. They will keep it up to date with the authentication needs of their various technologies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to rate all helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ethiel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-10-24T16:36:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ACS?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-acs/m-p/650986#M98884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have Cisco ACS Running for authentication based on Mac-Address, and I was questioned if the future is to use CiscoACS or something else? because if it is CiscoACS, then we will invest on a redudant Server. Did you ever done such configuration?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-acs/m-p/650986#M98884</guid>
      <dc:creator>jorge.s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACS?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-acs/m-p/650987#M98885</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, Cisco will be supporting and enhancing ACS for a long time. They have been adding support for NAC and other new features, so I find it to be the most robust option when using Cisco equipment. They will keep it up to date with the authentication needs of their various technologies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to rate all helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-acs/m-p/650987#M98885</guid>
      <dc:creator>ethiel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-24T16:36:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

