<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic you could run into issues, if in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493444#M99201</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;you could run into issues, if a client on wireless needed to access content at one of those addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason you need to put an IP address on the WLC, is for roaming purposes. With out an IP address there, the WLC would not know if a Layer 3 roam or Layer 2 roam happened.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Buidling A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 10 10.10.10.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 20 10.10.20.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Building B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 10 10.20.10.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 20 10.20.20.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you roam on the wireless between buildings, and the WLC only looked at the VLAN ID, your traffic would blackhole unless/until the client attempted to do DHCP, which isn't required to happen on a roam.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By putting an IP address on the interfaces on each WLC, the WLC would know that the client had made a layer 3 roam, and would then anchor traffic to the appropriate WLC so that traffic flow isn't interrupted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-13T14:24:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Several VLANs, same IP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493443#M99200</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a weird one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 3 industrial machines with the same hard coded IP address, 10.255.10.10/24. I need 3 different laptops to communicate with it's respective machine through a 2504 WLC. On the switch it's not a problem, I configure VLAN10, VLAN20 and VLAN30 for each machine without assigning any IP address to them. To create these VLAN interfaces on the WLC it's mandatory to provide a local IP address. Since all interfaces belong to the same scope this is impossible, and to get around it I have configured 3 dummy addresses for the interfaces; 2.2.2.2/30, 2.2.2.6/30 and 2.2.2.10/30. The laptops get static IPs 10.255.10.101, 10.255.10.102 and 10.255.10.103 and they can communicate without problems with their respective machine.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is: Could I run into trouble using fake IPs on the WLC interfaces. What are the purposes with these IPs?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Tomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 08:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493443#M99200</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomas.jacobsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T08:00:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>you could run into issues, if</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493444#M99201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you could run into issues, if a client on wireless needed to access content at one of those addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason you need to put an IP address on the WLC, is for roaming purposes. With out an IP address there, the WLC would not know if a Layer 3 roam or Layer 2 roam happened.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Buidling A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 10 10.10.10.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 20 10.10.20.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Building B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 10 10.20.10.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VLAN 20 10.20.20.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you roam on the wireless between buildings, and the WLC only looked at the VLAN ID, your traffic would blackhole unless/until the client attempted to do DHCP, which isn't required to happen on a roam.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By putting an IP address on the interfaces on each WLC, the WLC would know that the client had made a layer 3 roam, and would then anchor traffic to the appropriate WLC so that traffic flow isn't interrupted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493444#M99201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T14:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks a lot for the answer. </title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493445#M99202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Tomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/several-vlans-same-ip/m-p/2493445#M99202</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomas.jacobsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-23T08:24:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

