<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160657#M99259</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;having a large number of users in single subnet is not the best in all designs, since you will have a large single broadcast domain which is a true disaster with dense networks. If you the company policy states that we need only one single ssid &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for the whole employees within the company, it doesn't make sense to have them all on the same subnet. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A lot of options are available to overcome such issues :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for example, we might have AP groups feature , dynamic vlan assignment given that we have radius server in place, and vlan pooling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might not be feasible to have RADIUS server all the time, and AP groups might be kind of administrtive overhead as well as it might induce a lot of issues when aps fail over from controller to controller --&amp;gt; Vlan select is a good soultion considering the previously mentioned reasons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please Make sure to rate correct answers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 06:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>maldehne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-01T06:17:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160655#M99257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read from this forum some discussion about the WLC VLAN Select feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/113465/vlan-select-dg-00.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/113465/vlan-select-dg-00.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see that you can use this feature to have multiple VLANS (interfaces) to map to the same WLAN (SSID).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I try to learn is under what scenarios would people need to have mutliple vlan mapped to single SSID?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my environment, I have 50+ AP int he campus on 20+ Cisco 4500 switches.&amp;nbsp; I have single WLAN and it is mapped to one subnet.&amp;nbsp; All wireless users would be on that subnets, whereas wired users are on 20+ subnets of their own.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone help me to see under what scenarior (or requirement) that I would want to have multiple vlans mapped to single SSID?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160655#M99257</guid>
      <dc:creator>sactoraymond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T06:39:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160656#M99258</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many time the reason to use vlan select is to keep the subnet mask consistent. If you are use to having a /24 and want to keep a /24, them you can bundle a bunch of /24 subnet. Now there isn't anything wrong with having a loathe subnet because the WLC blocks broadcast traffic unless you allow it. In my install I have done both and both worked. Many of my large enterprise customers we have a /16 for guest and that works fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 02:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160656#M99258</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T02:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160657#M99259</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;having a large number of users in single subnet is not the best in all designs, since you will have a large single broadcast domain which is a true disaster with dense networks. If you the company policy states that we need only one single ssid &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for the whole employees within the company, it doesn't make sense to have them all on the same subnet. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A lot of options are available to overcome such issues :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for example, we might have AP groups feature , dynamic vlan assignment given that we have radius server in place, and vlan pooling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might not be feasible to have RADIUS server all the time, and AP groups might be kind of administrtive overhead as well as it might induce a lot of issues when aps fail over from controller to controller --&amp;gt; Vlan select is a good soultion considering the previously mentioned reasons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please Make sure to rate correct answers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 06:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160657#M99259</guid>
      <dc:creator>maldehne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T06:17:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160658#M99260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where in the WLC config that would let you determine if "WLC blocks broadcast traffic"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160658#M99260</guid>
      <dc:creator>sactoraymond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T19:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160659#M99261</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a screen shot.. Broadcast Forwarding set to Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/7/4/0/131047-3-1-2013%201-11-52%20PM.png" class="jive-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:13:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160659#M99261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T19:13:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160660#M99262</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi maldehne,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your opinion, how many concurrent wireless users in a WLAN would you see it as "large enough" that you would want to break them down into individual subnets?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And a slightly different question.&amp;nbsp; In situation where there are multiple VLANs on the same SSID, how does the traffic from wireless user-A (in subnet A) route to the wireless user-B (in subnet B)?&amp;nbsp; I expect that the routing is done at the typical layer-3 router, not at the WLC.&amp;nbsp; Am I correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my current setup, I have a firewall setup to control all the wireless traffic to the wired network.&amp;nbsp; If I am to break down the wireless network into mutlibple subnets, I assume I would need to truck the firewall interface for each subnet so I can continue govern the traffic.&amp;nbsp; Sounds right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160660#M99262</guid>
      <dc:creator>sactoraymond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T19:17:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160661#M99263</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The WLC will not do any routing, it will just bridge the traffic.&amp;nbsp; I have not seen any issue with having a large subnet and other here have used large subnet in their production network. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:32:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/scenario-for-single-wlan-to-multiple-vlans/m-p/2160661#M99263</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-01T22:32:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

