<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using the XML API with new Recording Trash - possible? in Cloud Collaboration</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556902#M1500</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The WebEx API's do not support the Recording Trash at this time, if something is trashed, its effectively deleted from the API Perspective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ryanhunt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-12T16:41:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using the XML API with new Recording Trash - possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556901#M1499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a problem with the new feature introduced in 31.5 - recordings can now be moved to "Trash".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem is, once this happens, the API returns "Not Found" when querying for the recording. Yet it still counts against our site quota.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the things we're doing is using the API to keep local records of each WebEx recording made with our site. This is problematic, because there is now no way to differentiate between recordings in the Trash (which count against quota) and recordings that are truly deleted (which no longer count against quota).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there API endpoints / schemas available for interacting with this new Trash area?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556901#M1499</guid>
      <dc:creator>matt.libera</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-12T13:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using the XML API with new Recording Trash - possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556902#M1500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The WebEx API's do not support the Recording Trash at this time, if something is trashed, its effectively deleted from the API Perspective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556902#M1500</guid>
      <dc:creator>ryanhunt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-12T16:41:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using the XML API with new Recording Trash - possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556903#M1501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Ryan. Is this planned for the future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you can see how this is problematic for us in our use case...if this is not planned, how can I submit a feature request?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-collaboration/using-the-xml-api-with-new-recording-trash-possible/m-p/3556903#M1501</guid>
      <dc:creator>matt.libera</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-12T17:36:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

