<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Provider.GetTerminals() array order? in Call Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4394692#M3074</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, I expected this was the case.&amp;nbsp; As for the AXL route, yep, we already use that in another product, so thats covered and is the answer given there is no guarantee on the order of that array.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:14:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tleask</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-28T11:14:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Provider.GetTerminals() array order?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4393900#M3071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Simple question really.&amp;nbsp; In the JTAPI docs it says...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;Provider.getTerminals()&lt;BR /&gt;This method returns an array of terminals that are created for the devices that are administered in the user&lt;BR /&gt;control list in the directory. Refer to the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Administration Guide to&lt;BR /&gt;administer the user control list.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What order is the array returned in, if any?&amp;nbsp; Is it the same order that is displayed when viewing that directory number in the CUCM admin pages?&amp;nbsp; Is there anyway to change the order of this list received?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:55:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4393900#M3071</guid>
      <dc:creator>tleask</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-27T10:55:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider.GetTerminals() array order?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4394365#M3072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not aware of any known order, and AFAIK none is documented - you may be able to figure it out, but it may not be dependable in the long term.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Depending on how particularly you need that type of functionality, you might investigate using AXL to query the CUCM config/database to get user associated devices.&amp;nbsp; You can get pretty specific about returned info fields and sort order if you go to the SQL level with &amp;lt;executeSqlQuery&amp;gt;...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 21:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4394365#M3072</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaudt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-27T21:59:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider.GetTerminals() array order?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4394692#M3074</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, I expected this was the case.&amp;nbsp; As for the AXL route, yep, we already use that in another product, so thats covered and is the answer given there is no guarantee on the order of that array.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:14:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/provider-getterminals-array-order/m-p/4394692#M3074</guid>
      <dc:creator>tleask</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-28T11:14:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

