<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CUCM V11 Backwards Compatibility in Call Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cucm-v11-backwards-compatibility/m-p/3439628#M322</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Austin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just going through the old unanswered questions in the forum and ran across yours. I assume that you have your answer since IVT is running tests for 11.x releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 23:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>davidn#</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-10T23:22:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CUCM V11 Backwards Compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cucm-v11-backwards-compatibility/m-p/3439627#M321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering in regards to SIP transactions, if the new CUCM v11 is drastically different than previous versions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I am asking is my company is about to start an IVT for a new Endpoint phone with Cisco, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However the most recent they let you test against is V10.5.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we were to test against V10.5, we need to be sure that there are no major SIP changes which could disrupt interoperability with the new V11.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any ideas if V11 if somewhat backwards compatible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Austin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 20:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cucm-v11-backwards-compatibility/m-p/3439627#M321</guid>
      <dc:creator>eklingman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-08T20:54:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CUCM V11 Backwards Compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cucm-v11-backwards-compatibility/m-p/3439628#M322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Austin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just going through the old unanswered questions in the forum and ran across yours. I assume that you have your answer since IVT is running tests for 11.x releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 23:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cucm-v11-backwards-compatibility/m-p/3439628#M322</guid>
      <dc:creator>davidn#</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-10T23:22:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

