<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Non deterministic single-step-transfer with internal addresses in Call Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4691808#M3356</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/976325"&gt;@Alexander Stevenson&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply.&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately it didn't help as there nothing related to my case in the troubleshooting documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue occur when using &lt;STRONG&gt;single step transfer&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you explain the behavior of JTAPI Api ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One additional information is the software who control the transfer request has control over the two terminals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you elevate this to the development team ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:22:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>snu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-22T07:22:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Non deterministic single-step-transfer with internal addresses</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4663516#M3307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to apply a single step transfer to a call and I'm experiencing non deterministic results while several internal terminals involved.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm simply invoke the "transfer" method on a call and I'm getting randomly different behavior when another internal address involved. When two external addresses involved it work every time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="single-step-issue.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/158997i45B6EB3F7F7F10C2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="single-step-issue.png" alt="single-step-issue.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I'm triggering the transfer method of a call and the only parameter is destination address, I don't get what I'm missing here.&lt;BR /&gt;Note : The other internal address is a real externally accessible address in international number format.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any other way to trigger single step transfer or choose to appropriate surviving source address ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank for your support !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS: I'm using CUCM v12.5&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 08:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4663516#M3307</guid>
      <dc:creator>snu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-04T08:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non deterministic single-step-transfer with internal addresses</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4669192#M3316</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1386912"&gt;@snu&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've found the&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/trouble/12_5_1/cucm_b_troubleshooting-guide-1251/cucm_b_troubleshooting-guide-1251_chapter_01000.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Troubleshooting Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Release 12.5(1)&lt;/A&gt; has troubleshooting for handling transfers under the Call Park section.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, your question was very clear and the image and version number are really helpful!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:58:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4669192#M3316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Stevenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-15T12:58:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non deterministic single-step-transfer with internal addresses</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4691808#M3356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/976325"&gt;@Alexander Stevenson&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply.&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately it didn't help as there nothing related to my case in the troubleshooting documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue occur when using &lt;STRONG&gt;single step transfer&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you explain the behavior of JTAPI Api ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One additional information is the software who control the transfer request has control over the two terminals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you elevate this to the development team ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:22:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4691808#M3356</guid>
      <dc:creator>snu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T07:22:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non deterministic single-step-transfer with internal addresses</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4692194#M3357</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you provide some details about the observed vs. expected behaviours in working vs. non-working scenarios?&amp;nbsp; Please be as specific as possible about phone models, DNs involved, gateways/trunks in the scenario, call leg steps and JTAPI objects/methods/events called/anticipated at each step.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure it should matter, but can you elaborate more on the target internal address that is 'really an external address?'&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/non-deterministic-single-step-transfer-with-internal-addresses/m-p/4692194#M3357</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaudt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-22T15:37:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

