<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic TAPI - simple question in Call Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/tapi-simple-question/m-p/4735899#M3367</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I was to develop a TAPI application, would a simple architecture include CUCM, Windows app server with the TSP and then the clients also with the TSP installed?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is for a Dynamics CRM pop/click2call app.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>m-jennings</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-09T20:29:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TAPI - simple question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/tapi-simple-question/m-p/4735899#M3367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I was to develop a TAPI application, would a simple architecture include CUCM, Windows app server with the TSP and then the clients also with the TSP installed?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is for a Dynamics CRM pop/click2call app.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/tapi-simple-question/m-p/4735899#M3367</guid>
      <dc:creator>m-jennings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-09T20:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TAPI - simple question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/tapi-simple-question/m-p/4735919#M3368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Generally, there are two common architectures:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* Client/Server: TAPI application links to TAPI32/CiscoTSP installed on the local Windows PC, talks directly to CUCM/CTI Manager over IP for commands/events.&amp;nbsp; Limits the client to a Windows native app; simpler architecture; required if you need to do softphone stuff with the Cisco TSP media driver, and the PC's mic/speaker; requires installing/configuring/updating of the Cisco TSP.&lt;BR /&gt;* Three-tier: CUCM/CTI-Manager -&amp;gt; Windows app server - Client.&amp;nbsp; The app server handles all TAPI commands/events, using RPC of some kind to proxy commands/events to the clients.&amp;nbsp; More complex architecture, but the clients can be anything (mobile apps, web apps, Mac/Linux, etc.).&amp;nbsp; Simplifies configuration/maintenance/troubleshooting to the single app server.&lt;BR /&gt;In general would recommend a three-tier architecture, unless you are unable to implement the middle-tier app server.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/tapi-simple-question/m-p/4735919#M3368</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaudt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-09T21:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

