<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco TAPI EOL in Call Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cisco-tapi-eol/m-p/3443109#M396</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing published, and no plans AFAIK...the TSP is still widely used by developers and customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 21:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dstaudt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-24T21:39:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco TAPI EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cisco-tapi-eol/m-p/3443108#M395</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any plans to EOL the Cisco TSP/TAPI? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cisco-tapi-eol/m-p/3443108#M395</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthampton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-24T17:03:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco TAPI EOL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cisco-tapi-eol/m-p/3443109#M396</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing published, and no plans AFAIK...the TSP is still widely used by developers and customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 21:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/cisco-tapi-eol/m-p/3443109#M396</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaudt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-24T21:39:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

