<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: supervisors in Management</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561912#M2087</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Anil,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the fast reply. I am glad to know that that problem is on the table. Is there some prospective time line? Can we be a beta testers of the solution? I work for university – it is perfect test bed:  from one side it is production with significant call load, from another, unlike big production call centers that sell stuff, we have very diverse environment and very patient customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am asking because I am on the fence right now – should I learn new skills to develop application on top of MediaSense and UCCX API or should I wait?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivan Karagodine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Voice Applications support/SysAdmin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NCS Core Infrastructure Applications&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;McGill University , Montreal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(514) 398-3913&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ivan.karagodine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-18T15:56:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561904#M2079</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does Media Sense allow supervisors to filter recordings so they can only hear their own agent's recordings?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible for administrators to restrict recordings so that only the supervisors of the teams can hear their own teams messages. i have a client that want to ensure that the recordings can be restricted by departments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;customer is looking to move to Media Sense to become their recording software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561904#M2079</guid>
      <dc:creator>dsutphin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T02:39:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561905#M2080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is currently not possible in the MediaSense software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is on our roadmap. It is not part of the 11.0 release (Target FCS is spring 2014). It is a very high priority items for the release following 11.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is your customer interested in using the MediaSense native S&amp;amp;P web application or the Finesse Supervisor Gadget?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 05:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561905#M2080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anil Verma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T05:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561906#M2081</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is native but is there is benefit to go with finesse&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dennis Sutphin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sr voice engineer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;813-925-6530&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561906#M2081</guid>
      <dc:creator>dsutphin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T11:11:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561907#M2082</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question about native or Finesse was to understand what to build first for this features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When being used in Finesse, we can get the information of the Teams that the supervisor is managing though Finesse. The login in done via a Finesse ID and MediaSense can get the required information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using Native mode, we are not sure where the information about the teams that the Supervisor is managing is stored and needs to come from. We are still looking at the options.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:29:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561907#M2082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anil Verma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T13:29:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561908#M2083</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customers environment is they currently use UCCE for their call center and use Varent for the recording platform. They currently are looking for an alternative to using Varent and ask us to look into Media Sense as a replacement. So the only alternative I can see at this time is if we are going to move forward with Media Sense is to install multiple clusters to separate the groups. Is this correct? Is there a different way that I have not considered?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;\&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dennis Sutphin, CCNP-Voice | GigaTech&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senior Voice Engineer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(OA) 813-925-6530&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(NOC) 813-864-8035&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network Dynamics, Inc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561908#M2083</guid>
      <dc:creator>dsutphin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T13:57:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561909#M2084</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes using separate installs for each business entity is one way to do this. I have seen others do this especially since MediaSense is now available in smaller 2vCPU form factor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some other customers have used a desktop solution from a partner to achieve this. You can look at the Solution Plus partners for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you want to discuss more about the design or roadmap, please feel to reach out to me at - &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:anilve@cisco.com"&gt;anilve@cisco.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; and we can talk live.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561909#M2084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anil Verma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T14:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561910#M2085</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are in process of implementing UCCX and dropping our old Oracle based contact center solution. We are moving to use Finesse as agents client.&amp;nbsp; The MediaSense recordings access for supervisors is the main drawback for our environment. We need to restrict supervisors access to recordings from their team members only. That is so strange to see modern solution does not implement any mechanism to limit access to such a private matter as call recordings while we had that in a solution deployed 11 years ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561910#M2085</guid>
      <dc:creator>ivan.karagodine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-18T14:15:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561911#M2086</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for bringing this up Ivan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes this is a glaring hole in our solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Putting in roles and permissions into the MediaSense Search &amp;amp; Play is the top priority item on my list for the release that follows 11.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anil Verma&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco MediaSense Product Manager&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anilve@cisco.com&amp;lt;mailto:anilve@cisco.com&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phone: +1 206 256 3081&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mobile: +1 253 670 3156&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Twitter: @anilve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561911#M2086</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anil Verma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-18T15:47:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561912#M2087</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Anil,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the fast reply. I am glad to know that that problem is on the table. Is there some prospective time line? Can we be a beta testers of the solution? I work for university – it is perfect test bed:  from one side it is production with significant call load, from another, unlike big production call centers that sell stuff, we have very diverse environment and very patient customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am asking because I am on the fence right now – should I learn new skills to develop application on top of MediaSense and UCCX API or should I wait?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivan Karagodine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Voice Applications support/SysAdmin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NCS Core Infrastructure Applications&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;McGill University , Montreal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(514) 398-3913&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561912#M2087</guid>
      <dc:creator>ivan.karagodine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-18T15:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561913#M2088</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We just released a product for MediaSense. The roles and permissions can be setup by department or certain groups of users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the link to the product - &lt;A href="http://donomasoftware.com/donoma-mediascribe/" title="http://donomasoftware.com/donoma-mediascribe/"&gt;Donoma MediaScribe | Donoma Software&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:10:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561913#M2088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Beena</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-18T16:10:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561914#M2089</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question that maybe is related to this problem. Is there a way of filtering records comming from UCCX CSQ , by the trigger they came from ? I know that by CSQ they can , but I am interested to to this by the trigger from UCCX and then maybe export them bulk. Does MediaSense have the option of exporting bulk ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561914#M2089</guid>
      <dc:creator>monicageorgescu1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-02T08:30:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561915#M2090</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the customer is using the Finesse Workflow to trigger recordings with UCCX, then the S&amp;amp;P can be used to only show data sorted by the CSQ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately MediaSense does not have Bulk capabilities built into the S&amp;amp;P GUI at this moment. It would be possible for the customers to do this using the API if they like. The API will allow them to search by CSQ tags and download the ones they want.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 19:00:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561915#M2090</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anil Verma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-02T19:00:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: supervisors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561916#M2091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Anil,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My client uses CUCM recording profile , not an action from UCCX . The calls come through UCCX Scripts to agents , which use Finesse , but the integration will be between MediaSense and CUCM . My question was if MediaSense can show me in session details somewhere , the Trigger associated to the UCCX Application / Script that the recorded call came through , because in my client environement , to sort the calls by CSQ it's not meaningfull. And if so, how can we tag this field . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/management/supervisors/m-p/3561916#M2091</guid>
      <dc:creator>monicageorgescu1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-03T09:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

