<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EasyQoS: consistency between hardware platforms in Controllers</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598286#M2348</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I should add&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;APIC-EM Version 1.5.0.1368&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WS-C3650-24PD&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 03.07.03E running ipbase&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:18:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simon Darlington</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-21T11:18:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EasyQoS: consistency between hardware platforms</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598285#M2347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When deploying a single EasyQoS policy to a scope that includes both 3650 and 4500 series switches in APIC-EM, there's an inconsistency with the CLI deployed. The Multimedia Conferencing class is missing from all 3650 devices, however is present on 4500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone experienced this issue when deploying a policy with scope that includes different hardware platforms?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 12:40:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598285#M2347</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon Darlington</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-01T12:40:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EasyQoS: consistency between hardware platforms</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598286#M2348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I should add&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;APIC-EM Version 1.5.0.1368&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WS-C3650-24PD&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 03.07.03E running ipbase&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:18:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598286#M2348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon Darlington</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-21T11:18:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EasyQoS: consistency between hardware platforms</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598287#M2349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Simon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you share a show policy-map please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adam&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/controllers/easyqos-consistency-between-hardware-platforms/m-p/3598287#M2349</guid>
      <dc:creator>aradford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-21T18:13:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

